SIGNATURE POINTE

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Reasonable Accommodation of Needs.1. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #1's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 8/12/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a call light system that accommodated her physical limitation. These failures could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 08/12/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's relevant diagnoses included repeated seizures (uncontrolled jerking) and convulsions. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/24/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. ADL care reflected the resident required extensive assistance. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 08/12/2025, which was updated after the surveyor observed the concern, reflected the resident had limited range of motion bilateral hand contractures (tightening of joints) and one of the interventions was to use a soft touch call light and place in reach of the resident's left hand. In an observation on 08/12/25 at 10:05 AM, Resident #1 was observed lying in bed, and her light touch pad call light was not within reach. The call light was observed to be hanging on the back wall behind the bed. Both resident's hands appeared contracted. An attempt was made to interview the resident, but she did not appear coherent. In an observation and interview on 08/12/25 at 10:07 AM, LVN S stated Resident #1 required total care and had to be fed. She stated they would have to anticipate the resident's needs by checking on her every two hours. She stated she was unsure if the resident could use the call light button or a call light touch pad. She stated the admitting nurse should have assessed the resident for this. She stated the resident was a full code and would need to contact staff if she was in distress. In an interview on 08/12/25 at 10:30 AM, the DON and ADON were advised Resident #1 did not have her call light within reach and based on the resident's contracted hands, it was unclear if the resident could push the call light button. The DON stated the resident was new to the facility and she did not know if the resident could use a call light button or call light touch pad. She stated an assessment was never completed to determine if the resident could use a call light or touch pad to alert staff if she was in distress. The DON stated the nursing staff admitting the resident should have assessed for this when the resident was admitted to the facility. She stated whoever the nurse on duty at the time the resident was admitted , should have completed this task, so there was not a particular nurse assigned, and she could not recall who admitted the resident. The DON stated the resident was a full code and would require assistance if she had any distress. She stated they checked on the resident at least every two hours. She stated they would assess the resident to see if she was cognitively able to use the call light touch pad, and care plan it if the resident was not able to use the call light button or call light touch pad. She stated there was no risk for the resident because they checked on the resident at least every two hours to ensure she was not in distress. In an interview on 08/12/25 at 12:50 PM, the Administrator was advised of Resident #1 not being assessed for being able to use a call light and he stated he had his maintenance director install a call light touch pad for the resident today, and they were able to assess the resident was able to use the call light touch pad to alert staff for any assistance. He stated the call light touch pad was needed for the resident to ensure she could contact staff if she was in distress. Record review of the facility's policy on Call System, Residents (September 2022), reflected Residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized workstation. Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor. If the resident has a disability that prevents him/her from making use of the call system, an alternative means of communication that is usable for the resident is provided and documented in the care plan.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident free from physical restraints not required to treat the residents' medical symptoms as was possible for one of five residents (Resident #2) reviewed for physical restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had physician orders for the for the bolster pads (bed padding) attached to the mattress on her bed. This failure could failure could place residents at risk of not having an environment that was free of restraints which could result in injury. Findings include:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 08/12/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's relevant diagnoses included muscle weakness and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/24/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. ADL care reflected the resident required extensive assistance. Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 07/18/25, reflected the resident was a fall risk related to her recent admission to the community, but the interventions did not include the bolster pads. Record review of Resident #2's physician orders, dated 08/12/25, reflected no physician orders for the bolster pads. In an observation on 08/12/25 at 10:10 AM, Resident #2 was observed lying in bed. The resident's bed had bolster pads, that measured approximately six inches in height and six inches in thickness. The resident could not freely exit the bed. The pads were placed on all sides of the resident's bed. In an interview on 08/12/25 at 10: 45 AM, the DON and ADON stated Resident #2 transferred from another facility and had the bolster pads when she arrived. They stated the resident did not have physician orders for the bolster pads, and they stated they did not think it was not a risk for the resident. They stated hospice provided the resident the bolster pads, but they were unsure why the resident required it. They stated she would contact the physician to obtain physician orders for the resident to have the equipment. She stated she did not know physician orders were required for this equipment. In an interview on 08/12/25 at 12:50 PM, the Administrator was advised of Resident #2 not having physician orders for the bolster pads on her mattress and he stated he did not think there was any risk for the resident having the equipment. He stated Hospice provided the equipment to the resident prior to her being transferred to the facility. Record review of the facility's policy USE OF RESTRAINTS AND SECLUSION (11/02/15) reflected All patients have the right to be free from physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment. All patients have the right to be free from restraints or seclusion of any form, to include coercion, discipline, convenience, or retaliation by staff. Restraint or seclusion may only be imposed to ensure the immediate physical safety of the patient, a staff member or others, and must be discontinued at the earliest possible time. Interpretations and Definitions: 'Physical restraints' are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. Practices that inappropriately utilize equipment to prevent resident mobility are considered restraints and are not permitted.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #10 and #80) reviewed for Respiratory Care.<BR/>1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's CPAP hose, for the CPAP machine was placed in a sanitary area and not on the floor.<BR/>2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #80's nasal cannula, for the oxygen concentrator was placed in a sanitary container when not in use.<BR/>These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.<BR/>Findings include:<BR/>1. <BR/>Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 10/23/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #10's relevant diagnoses included sleep apnea (sleep disorder), and chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). <BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], reflected, he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, severe cognitive impairment) and for active diagnosis it reflected sleep apnea.<BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Comprehensive care plan, dated 12/30/24, reflected the resident required oxygen therapy and used a sleep apnea machine for sleep apnea obstruction.<BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Physician Order, dated 02/11/25, reflected CPAP on at HS (SETTINGS 9/13) At Bedtime 21:00 <BR/>In an interview and observation on 02/11/25 at 11:29 AM, LVN observed Resident #10's CPAP Hose was sitting on the floor, disconnected from the mask, which was bagged. LVN S stated the hose should not have been on the floor because it could be contaminated, and it was an infection control concern.<BR/>2. <BR/>Record review of Resident #80's face sheet, dated 02/11/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #80's relevant diagnoses included sleep apnea (sleep disorder), and Intracardiac thrombosis (blood clots). <BR/>Record review of Resident #80's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], reflected he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognitive response. Resident #80 had active treatments which included continuous oxygen therapy.<BR/>Record review of Resident #80's Comprehensive care plan, dated 01/30/25, reflected the resident required oxygen therapy and reflected Administer oxygen at 0-4L (rate) via NC (device). Observe oxygen precautions.<BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Physician Order, dated (02/11/25), reflected respiratory: O2 at 0-2l/min at start -per NC - titrate up 1l/min to maintain O2 sats &gt;92%<BR/>Special Instructions: Continuous O2 at 0-2L/min to maintain O2 SATS &gt;92% - <BR/>In an interview and observation on 02/11/25 at 10:57 AM, LVN T observed Resident #80's nasal canula hanging on her headboard and unbagged and she was not in the room. LVN T stated the resident's nasal canula should have been bagged to avoid it from getting contaminated. The tubing was observed balled up on the floor and the tubing should not touch the ground because it could be contaminated, and it was an infection control concern.<BR/>In an interview on 02/13/25 at 9:00 AM, the DON was advised of Resident #10's hose for his CPAP machine being on the floor and Resident #80's nasal canula not being bagged while not in use. She stated both concerns could cause respiratory issues and it was an infection control concern. She stated she completed in-services with the nursing staff on oxygen and tubing, which covered storing the resident's nasal canula and the CPAP machine when not in use from 12/06/24 to 12/13/24. <BR/>In an interview on 02/13/25 at 09:30 AM, the Executive Director was advised of the concerns observed with Resident #10's hose for his CPAP machine being on the floor and Resident #80's nasal canula not being bagged while not in use. She stated that both concerns are infection control concerns. She advised she would follow up with the DON.<BR/>Record review of the facility's policy, Respiratory Therapy. (11/2011) revealed The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff .8. <BR/>Keep the oxygen cannulas and tubing used PRN in a plastic bag when not in use.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Reasonable Accommodation of Needs.1. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #1's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 8/12/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a call light system that accommodated her physical limitation. These failures could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 08/12/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's relevant diagnoses included repeated seizures (uncontrolled jerking) and convulsions. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/24/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. ADL care reflected the resident required extensive assistance. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 08/12/2025, which was updated after the surveyor observed the concern, reflected the resident had limited range of motion bilateral hand contractures (tightening of joints) and one of the interventions was to use a soft touch call light and place in reach of the resident's left hand. In an observation on 08/12/25 at 10:05 AM, Resident #1 was observed lying in bed, and her light touch pad call light was not within reach. The call light was observed to be hanging on the back wall behind the bed. Both resident's hands appeared contracted. An attempt was made to interview the resident, but she did not appear coherent. In an observation and interview on 08/12/25 at 10:07 AM, LVN S stated Resident #1 required total care and had to be fed. She stated they would have to anticipate the resident's needs by checking on her every two hours. She stated she was unsure if the resident could use the call light button or a call light touch pad. She stated the admitting nurse should have assessed the resident for this. She stated the resident was a full code and would need to contact staff if she was in distress. In an interview on 08/12/25 at 10:30 AM, the DON and ADON were advised Resident #1 did not have her call light within reach and based on the resident's contracted hands, it was unclear if the resident could push the call light button. The DON stated the resident was new to the facility and she did not know if the resident could use a call light button or call light touch pad. She stated an assessment was never completed to determine if the resident could use a call light or touch pad to alert staff if she was in distress. The DON stated the nursing staff admitting the resident should have assessed for this when the resident was admitted to the facility. She stated whoever the nurse on duty at the time the resident was admitted , should have completed this task, so there was not a particular nurse assigned, and she could not recall who admitted the resident. The DON stated the resident was a full code and would require assistance if she had any distress. She stated they checked on the resident at least every two hours. She stated they would assess the resident to see if she was cognitively able to use the call light touch pad, and care plan it if the resident was not able to use the call light button or call light touch pad. She stated there was no risk for the resident because they checked on the resident at least every two hours to ensure she was not in distress. In an interview on 08/12/25 at 12:50 PM, the Administrator was advised of Resident #1 not being assessed for being able to use a call light and he stated he had his maintenance director install a call light touch pad for the resident today, and they were able to assess the resident was able to use the call light touch pad to alert staff for any assistance. He stated the call light touch pad was needed for the resident to ensure she could contact staff if she was in distress. Record review of the facility's policy on Call System, Residents (September 2022), reflected Residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized workstation. Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor. If the resident has a disability that prevents him/her from making use of the call system, an alternative means of communication that is usable for the resident is provided and documented in the care plan.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident free from physical restraints not required to treat the residents' medical symptoms as was possible for one of five residents (Resident #2) reviewed for physical restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had physician orders for the for the bolster pads (bed padding) attached to the mattress on her bed. This failure could failure could place residents at risk of not having an environment that was free of restraints which could result in injury. Findings include:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 08/12/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's relevant diagnoses included muscle weakness and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/24/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. ADL care reflected the resident required extensive assistance. Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 07/18/25, reflected the resident was a fall risk related to her recent admission to the community, but the interventions did not include the bolster pads. Record review of Resident #2's physician orders, dated 08/12/25, reflected no physician orders for the bolster pads. In an observation on 08/12/25 at 10:10 AM, Resident #2 was observed lying in bed. The resident's bed had bolster pads, that measured approximately six inches in height and six inches in thickness. The resident could not freely exit the bed. The pads were placed on all sides of the resident's bed. In an interview on 08/12/25 at 10: 45 AM, the DON and ADON stated Resident #2 transferred from another facility and had the bolster pads when she arrived. They stated the resident did not have physician orders for the bolster pads, and they stated they did not think it was not a risk for the resident. They stated hospice provided the resident the bolster pads, but they were unsure why the resident required it. They stated she would contact the physician to obtain physician orders for the resident to have the equipment. She stated she did not know physician orders were required for this equipment. In an interview on 08/12/25 at 12:50 PM, the Administrator was advised of Resident #2 not having physician orders for the bolster pads on her mattress and he stated he did not think there was any risk for the resident having the equipment. He stated Hospice provided the equipment to the resident prior to her being transferred to the facility. Record review of the facility's policy USE OF RESTRAINTS AND SECLUSION (11/02/15) reflected All patients have the right to be free from physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment. All patients have the right to be free from restraints or seclusion of any form, to include coercion, discipline, convenience, or retaliation by staff. Restraint or seclusion may only be imposed to ensure the immediate physical safety of the patient, a staff member or others, and must be discontinued at the earliest possible time. Interpretations and Definitions: 'Physical restraints' are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. Practices that inappropriately utilize equipment to prevent resident mobility are considered restraints and are not permitted.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the confidentiality of the residents personal and medical records for five (Residents #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7's) of five residents reviewed for Privacy and Confidentiality.<BR/>The facility failed to ensure LVN C did not leave Residents #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7's medical information exposed and unattended on top of the nurse's cart on 05/08/2025.<BR/>This failure could place the residents at risk of their medical information being exposed to unauthorized individuals.<BR/>Findings included: <BR/>Resident #3<BR/>Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 05/08/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar).<BR/>Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 04/09/2025, reflected the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated the resident had diabetes mellitus.<BR/>Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 04/28/2025, reflected the resident had disease and conditions which were treated with medications and would be managed by the clinical team.<BR/>Record review of Resident #3's Physician's Order, dated 04/23/2025, reflected Humalog (fast-acting insulin that lowers blood sugar) U-100 Insulin (insulin lispro) . Per Sliding Scale . Before Meals and At Bedtime . Task(s) to Record: Blood Sugar.<BR/>Resident #4<BR/>Record review of Resident # 4's Face Sheet, dated 05/08/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. <BR/>Record review of Resident #4's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 03/10/2025, reflected the resident had a moderate impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 11. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated the resident had hypertension and diabetes mellitus.<BR/>Record review of Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 03/12/2025, reflected the resident had disease process and conditions and would be managed by the clinician team composed of nursing and the physician.<BR/>Record review of Resident #4's Physician's Order, dated 03/04/2025, reflected VITAL SIGNS: MEDICARE Special Instructions: RECORD COMPLETE SET OF VITAL SIGNS EVERY SHIFT IN EMAR ORDER -PATIENT'S VITAL SIGNS ENTERED ON EMAR WILL SHOW UNDER RESIDENT'S VITAL SIGNS ALSO IN MATRIX (cloud-based EMR used to collect and record medical data) Every Shift DAY 07:00 - 19:00 (7:00 PM), NIGHT 19:00 ( 7:00 PM) - 07:00.<BR/>Record review of Resident #4's Physician's Order, dated 03/05/2025, reflected Humulin R Regular U-100 Insulin (insulin regular human) solution; 100 unit/mL; amt: Per Sliding Scale . Task(s) to Record: Blood Sugar.<BR/>Resident #5<BR/>Record review of Resident # 5's Face Sheet, dated 05/08/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. <BR/>Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 05/06/2025, reflected the resident as cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated the resident had diabetes mellitus.<BR/>Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 03/12/2025, reflected the resident had disease process and conditions and would be managed by the clinician team composed of nursing and physician.<BR/>Record review of Resident #6s Physician's Order, dated 05/06/2025, reflected DIABETIC: FINGER STICK BLOOD SUGAR . Task(s) to Record: Blood Sugar.<BR/>Resident #6<BR/>Record review of Resident #6's Face Sheet, dated 05/08/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. <BR/>Record review of Resident #6's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 05/05/2025, reflected the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated the resident had diabetes mellitus.<BR/>Record review of Resident #6's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 05/06/2025, reflected the resident had diabetes and the goal was the blood sugar would not exceed 400.<BR/>Record review of Resident #6's Physician's Order, dated 04/29/2025, reflected insulin lispro . Per Sliding Scale . Before Meals and At Bedtime . Task(s) to Record:<BR/>Blood Sugar.<BR/>Resident #7<BR/>Record review of Resident #7's Face Sheet, dated 05/08/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. <BR/>Record review of Resident #7's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 04/07/2025, reflected the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated the resident had diabetes mellitus.<BR/>Record review of Resident #7's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 04/02/2025, reflected the resident had disease process and conditions and would be managed by the clinician team composed of nursing and physician.<BR/>Record review of Resident #7s Physician's Order, dated 04/15/2025, reflected Humalog Kwik Pen Insulin (insulin lispro) . Per Sliding Scale . Before Meals and At Bedtime . Task(s) to Record: Blood Sugar.<BR/>Observation on 05/08/2025 at 8:58 AM revealed a piece of paper was left on top of a nurse's cart parked in the hallway. On the piece of paper was Resident #3's name, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, and blood sugar. On the same piece of paper were Residents #4, #5, #6, and #7's names and their respective blood sugars. The nurse's cart was unattended and was facing the hallway with several staff walking back and forth.<BR/>In an interview and observation on 05/08/2025 at 9:01 AM, ADON A saw the piece of paper on top of the nurse's cart with Residents #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7's medical information. She flipped the piece of paper so the residents' medical information was not exposed and could not be seen by unauthorized individuals. She stated the residents' information was restricted to unauthorized individuals and it was a HIPAA violation if the information were visible to others that were not providing care to the residents. She said the expectation was for the staff not to leave any personal or medical information about any resident at any time. She said she would coordinate with the DON to do an in-service about privacy and confidentiality.<BR/>In an interview on 05/08/2025 at 9:06 AM, LVN C stated she left the cart because she administered a treatment to one of the residents. She said the best practice was to secure any information about the residents before leaving the cart. She said the piece of paper had some of the residents' names, vital signs, and blood sugars. She said she should have flipped it or put it inside the drawer before leaving the cart. She said she would be mindful that no information about the resident would be left on top of the cart.<BR/>In an interview on 05/08/2025 at 12:30 PM, the Administrator stated the staff must make sure the residents' information was not exposed and protected because it was a violation of the residents privacy and confidentiality. She said the vital signs and the blood sugars were medical information and should not be seen by unauthorized individuals. She said the expectation was for all the staff to make sure the personal and medical information of a resident were not left unattended. She said she would collaborate with the DON to do an in-service about privacy and confidentiality.<BR/>In an interview on 05/08/2025 at 1:08 PM, the DON stated personal and medical information about a resident should not be exposed for everybody to see because they were confidential. She said the health information of a resident should be protected and could not be shared without the permission of the resident or the resident's responsible party. She said the staff were expected to provide full privacy and confidentiality of information for all residents. The DON stated she would start an in-service about privacy and confidentiality of the residents' information.<BR/>Record review of the facility's policy, Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy 2001 MED-PASS revised October 2017 revealed Policy Statement: Our facility will protect and safeguard resident confidentiality and personal privacy . Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 1. The facility will safeguard the personal privacy and confidentiality of all resident personal and medical records.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #10 and #80) reviewed for Respiratory Care.<BR/>1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's CPAP hose, for the CPAP machine was placed in a sanitary area and not on the floor.<BR/>2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #80's nasal cannula, for the oxygen concentrator was placed in a sanitary container when not in use.<BR/>These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.<BR/>Findings include:<BR/>1. <BR/>Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 10/23/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #10's relevant diagnoses included sleep apnea (sleep disorder), and chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). <BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], reflected, he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, severe cognitive impairment) and for active diagnosis it reflected sleep apnea.<BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Comprehensive care plan, dated 12/30/24, reflected the resident required oxygen therapy and used a sleep apnea machine for sleep apnea obstruction.<BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Physician Order, dated 02/11/25, reflected CPAP on at HS (SETTINGS 9/13) At Bedtime 21:00 <BR/>In an interview and observation on 02/11/25 at 11:29 AM, LVN observed Resident #10's CPAP Hose was sitting on the floor, disconnected from the mask, which was bagged. LVN S stated the hose should not have been on the floor because it could be contaminated, and it was an infection control concern.<BR/>2. <BR/>Record review of Resident #80's face sheet, dated 02/11/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #80's relevant diagnoses included sleep apnea (sleep disorder), and Intracardiac thrombosis (blood clots). <BR/>Record review of Resident #80's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], reflected he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognitive response. Resident #80 had active treatments which included continuous oxygen therapy.<BR/>Record review of Resident #80's Comprehensive care plan, dated 01/30/25, reflected the resident required oxygen therapy and reflected Administer oxygen at 0-4L (rate) via NC (device). Observe oxygen precautions.<BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Physician Order, dated (02/11/25), reflected respiratory: O2 at 0-2l/min at start -per NC - titrate up 1l/min to maintain O2 sats &gt;92%<BR/>Special Instructions: Continuous O2 at 0-2L/min to maintain O2 SATS &gt;92% - <BR/>In an interview and observation on 02/11/25 at 10:57 AM, LVN T observed Resident #80's nasal canula hanging on her headboard and unbagged and she was not in the room. LVN T stated the resident's nasal canula should have been bagged to avoid it from getting contaminated. The tubing was observed balled up on the floor and the tubing should not touch the ground because it could be contaminated, and it was an infection control concern.<BR/>In an interview on 02/13/25 at 9:00 AM, the DON was advised of Resident #10's hose for his CPAP machine being on the floor and Resident #80's nasal canula not being bagged while not in use. She stated both concerns could cause respiratory issues and it was an infection control concern. She stated she completed in-services with the nursing staff on oxygen and tubing, which covered storing the resident's nasal canula and the CPAP machine when not in use from 12/06/24 to 12/13/24. <BR/>In an interview on 02/13/25 at 09:30 AM, the Executive Director was advised of the concerns observed with Resident #10's hose for his CPAP machine being on the floor and Resident #80's nasal canula not being bagged while not in use. She stated that both concerns are infection control concerns. She advised she would follow up with the DON.<BR/>Record review of the facility's policy, Respiratory Therapy. (11/2011) revealed The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff .8. <BR/>Keep the oxygen cannulas and tubing used PRN in a plastic bag when not in use.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #10 and #80) reviewed for Respiratory Care.<BR/>1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's CPAP hose, for the CPAP machine was placed in a sanitary area and not on the floor.<BR/>2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #80's nasal cannula, for the oxygen concentrator was placed in a sanitary container when not in use.<BR/>These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.<BR/>Findings include:<BR/>1. <BR/>Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 10/23/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #10's relevant diagnoses included sleep apnea (sleep disorder), and chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). <BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], reflected, he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, severe cognitive impairment) and for active diagnosis it reflected sleep apnea.<BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Comprehensive care plan, dated 12/30/24, reflected the resident required oxygen therapy and used a sleep apnea machine for sleep apnea obstruction.<BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Physician Order, dated 02/11/25, reflected CPAP on at HS (SETTINGS 9/13) At Bedtime 21:00 <BR/>In an interview and observation on 02/11/25 at 11:29 AM, LVN observed Resident #10's CPAP Hose was sitting on the floor, disconnected from the mask, which was bagged. LVN S stated the hose should not have been on the floor because it could be contaminated, and it was an infection control concern.<BR/>2. <BR/>Record review of Resident #80's face sheet, dated 02/11/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #80's relevant diagnoses included sleep apnea (sleep disorder), and Intracardiac thrombosis (blood clots). <BR/>Record review of Resident #80's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], reflected he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognitive response. Resident #80 had active treatments which included continuous oxygen therapy.<BR/>Record review of Resident #80's Comprehensive care plan, dated 01/30/25, reflected the resident required oxygen therapy and reflected Administer oxygen at 0-4L (rate) via NC (device). Observe oxygen precautions.<BR/>Record review of Resident #10's Physician Order, dated (02/11/25), reflected respiratory: O2 at 0-2l/min at start -per NC - titrate up 1l/min to maintain O2 sats &gt;92%<BR/>Special Instructions: Continuous O2 at 0-2L/min to maintain O2 SATS &gt;92% - <BR/>In an interview and observation on 02/11/25 at 10:57 AM, LVN T observed Resident #80's nasal canula hanging on her headboard and unbagged and she was not in the room. LVN T stated the resident's nasal canula should have been bagged to avoid it from getting contaminated. The tubing was observed balled up on the floor and the tubing should not touch the ground because it could be contaminated, and it was an infection control concern.<BR/>In an interview on 02/13/25 at 9:00 AM, the DON was advised of Resident #10's hose for his CPAP machine being on the floor and Resident #80's nasal canula not being bagged while not in use. She stated both concerns could cause respiratory issues and it was an infection control concern. She stated she completed in-services with the nursing staff on oxygen and tubing, which covered storing the resident's nasal canula and the CPAP machine when not in use from 12/06/24 to 12/13/24. <BR/>In an interview on 02/13/25 at 09:30 AM, the Executive Director was advised of the concerns observed with Resident #10's hose for his CPAP machine being on the floor and Resident #80's nasal canula not being bagged while not in use. She stated that both concerns are infection control concerns. She advised she would follow up with the DON.<BR/>Record review of the facility's policy, Respiratory Therapy. (11/2011) revealed The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff .8. <BR/>Keep the oxygen cannulas and tubing used PRN in a plastic bag when not in use.

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distributed, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. <BR/>1. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff wore the appropriate beard and hair covering while food was being prepared in the main kitchen.<BR/>2. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure the food stored in the refrigerator was properly sealed from air-borne contaminants.<BR/>3. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the basement area was cleaned and the ice scoop holder was not exposed to air-borne contaminants.<BR/>4. <BR/>The facility failed to cover a large trash can stored in the kitchen area.<BR/>5. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure the food storage bins in the dry storage area were cleaned. <BR/>6. <BR/>The facility failed to discard expired food in the refrigerator. <BR/>7. <BR/>The facility failed to place a cover on top of the tea dispenser to avoid air borne contaminants.<BR/>These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses.<BR/>Findings include: <BR/>Observations on 02/11/25 from 9:10 AM to 9:17 AM in the facility's main kitchen revealed: <BR/>The ice machine door, located in the basement outside of the kitchen, had white and brown dirt stains inside the door and a white plastic piece located above the ice had black dirt and rust on it. The ice scoop was sitting in a holder, but it was exposed to airborne contaminants because it was not covered. <BR/>One large trash can, which contained food and trash, in the kitchen area, was uncovered. <BR/>One tubing of whip cream, stored in the refrigerator, had a use by date of 02/05/25 and was not discarded.<BR/>Dish water T was observed walking around the kitchen area, and he was observed to have a beard that was at least a &frac14; inch in length, but no beard covering was worn.<BR/>Cook S and [NAME] B were wearing baseball caps but had large ponytails, at least 2 inches in length protruding from the baseball caps. <BR/>Four large storage bins containing rice, flour, sugar, and breadcrumbs, were in dirt-stained containers. The containers had brownish and black stains on the outside and inside of the containers. <BR/>One large box of bacon, located in the freezer, was not sealed, and exposed to airborne contaminants.<BR/>One large tea dispenser, located in the kitchen area, did not have a lid placed on the top dispenser to avoid air-borne contaminants. <BR/>In an interview on 02/12/25 at 12:46 PM, the DM was advised of Dishwasher T being observed with a beard, approximately more than a &frac14; inch in length, and no beard covering was worn. She was also advised [NAME] S and [NAME] B were wearing baseball caps but had large ponytails protruding from the baseball caps. The DM was advised of their entire hair needing to be covered to avoid hair from falling into the resident's food. She stated this was her fault because she was not aware of this. She advised she would be correcting this concern. She was shown pictures of the concerns in the main kitchen, and she stated the cooks and dishwashers were responsible for ensuring the kitchen equipment, be cleaned at least once a week. She stated the ice machine was cleaned by maintenance monthly and she would meet with them to clean it. She stated she would get with the ED to discuss getting a suitable container to hold the ice scoop to avoid it being in the open and exposed to airborne contaminants.<BR/>In an interview on 02/13/25 at 09:30 AM, the Executive Director was advised and shown pictures of the concerns observed in the facility's main kitchen area. She advised she had not met with her Dietary Manager yet to address the concerns. She stated the concerns not being addressed could result in food contamination and residents could get sick. She stated she would follow up with the DM.<BR/>Record review of the facility's policy on Food Receiving and Storage (November 2022), revealed Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .1. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled and dated ('use by' date) .7. Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated and monitored so they are used by their 'use-by' date, frozen, or discarded. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy on Food Safety and Sanitation (2023), revealed, All local, state, and federal standards and regulations will be followed to assure a safe and sanitary food and nutrition services department .c. Employees are required to have their hair styled so that it does not touch the collar, and to wear clean aprons, clothes, and closed toe shoes. <BR/>o <BR/>Hair restraints are required and should cover all hair on the head. <BR/>o <BR/>Beard nets are required when facial hair is visible .<BR/>6. <BR/>Employees will follow proper cleaning and sanitizing instructions for all kitchen equipment.<BR/>Record review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Code (2022) revealed, Packaged Food shall be labeled as specified in LAW, including 21 CFR 101 food Labeling, 9 CFR 317 Labeling, Marking Devices, and Containers, and 9 CFR 381 Subpart N Labeling and Containers, and as specified under &sect; 3-202.18 .Food shall be protected from contamination that may result from a factor or source not specified under Subparts 3-301 - 3-306.<BR/>Record review of Title 21--Food and Drugs Chapter I--Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services<BR/>Subchapter b - Food for Human Consumption part 110 -- current good manufacturing practice in manufacturing, packing, or holding human food.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for medication storage.<BR/>The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 didn't have a box of Mucinex (medication used to treat the symptoms of cough and congestion) tablets left unattended and unsecured on the bedside table on 02/11/2025.<BR/>This failure could place residents at risk for misappropriation of property, risk for accidents, hazards, and not receiving therapeutic effects of the medication. <BR/>The findings include:<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Face Sheet, dated 02/11/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included Covid-19 (respiratory illness caused by a virus) and acute respiratory failure (respiratory condition that makes it difficult to breathe).<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Quarterly MDS (tool used to assess health and functional capabilities status of resident) Assessment, dated 01/05/2025, reflected Resident #40 had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 07. Section I did not reflect current treatment for a pulmonary (lung related) condition.<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Physician Orders, dated 03/13/2022, reflected Mucinex D 60-600 mg tablet extended release 12 hr 600mg, oral, Twice A Day - PRN. <BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 01/05/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for progression/onset of opportunistic infection related to Covid-19 virus positive status (per CDC recommendation) - Resolved. One intervention was to administer medications and treatments as ordered. <BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Continuity of Care, dated 02/14/2025, reflected the last dose of Mucinex D was administered by facility staff on 09/19/2023 at 01:58 PM. <BR/>Observation and interview on 02/11/2025 AT 10:46 AM revealed an open box of Mucinex on Resident #40's bedside table. The box of Mucinex was in a plastic organizer that held the resident's personal items. Resident #40 stated her family member brought the box of Mucinex to her a long time ago, but she had not taken any of the medication. <BR/>During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 10:53 AM, the ADON stated the medication should not have been in Resident #40's room. She stated an assessment and physician's order was required for a resident to self-administer medication and Resident #40 did not have an assessment included in her chart to self-administer medication. The ADON stated the resident could have taken the medication and staff also gave the medication to the resident. The ADON stated we do not want her to overmedicate. The ADON removed the medication from Resident #40's room.<BR/>During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 11:01 AM, LVN C stated she had not seen the Mucinex in Resident #40's room. LVN C stated the Mucinex should not have been in Resident #40's room. She stated the resident might take more than the directions said and staff would not know. LVN C stated residents could only have medication in their room if the doctor authorized it. <BR/>During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:20 PM, the DON stated sometimes family brought things to residents and staff did not know about. The DON stated the administrator contacted Resident #40's family and asked them not to bring medication to the resident's room. The DON stated another resident could go in Resident #40's room and take the medication. The DON stated a resident was required to pass an assessment and have a physician's order to self-administer medication. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy Self-Administration of Medications , revised February 2021, reflected Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration are turned over to the nurse in charge for return to the family or responsible party.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of eight residents (Resident #32) reviewed for infection control.<BR/>The facility failed to ensure CNA B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #32 on 02/12/2025.<BR/>This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.<BR/>The findings include:<BR/>Record review of Resident #32's Face Sheet, dated 02/12/2025, reflected Resident #32 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #32 had diagnoses which included Wernicke's encephalopathy (neurological condition caused by deficiency of vitamin B1) and muscle weakness. <BR/>Record review of Resident #32's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/13/2024, reflected severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 3. The MDS reflected Resident #32 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent on staff for toileting needs. <BR/>Record review of Resident #32's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 11/13/2024, reflected Resident #32 needs assistance with daily ADL care and one intervention was to assist as needed with incontinent care. <BR/>An observation and interview on 02/12/25 at 10:15 AM revealed CNA B provided incontinence care for Resident #32. CNA B explained to Resident #32 what she was going to do. CNA B collected care items and washed her hands in Resident #32's restroom. CNA B pulled the drape around Resident #32's bed to provide privacy. CNA B put on clean gloves and loosened the tabs on each side of Resident #32's brief. CNA B used a wipe to clean one side of the labia (part of the female genitalia) with one swipe and dropped the wipe in the wastebasket next to her. CNA B changed gloves without performing hand hygiene and used a clean wipe to clean the other side of the labia. CNA B dropped the wipe in the wastebasket and changed gloves without performing hand hygiene. CNA B used a wipe to clean the vagina (part of the female genital tract) and dropped the wipe into the wastebasket. CNA B removed her gloves, used hand sanitizer, and put on clean gloves. Resident #32 rolled to the right side. CNA B used a clean wipe to clean one side of Resident #32's bottom and changed gloves. CNA B cleaned the other side of Resident #32's bottom and changed gloves. CNA B cleaned between the buttocks, wiping away from the vagina, and changed gloves. CNA B wiped again between the buttocks to ensure the resident was clean. She dropped the wipe and soiled brief into the wastebasket. CNA B removed the soiled gloves, used hand sanitizer, and put on clean gloves. She placed a clean brief under the resident and applied barrier cream on her bottom. CNA B removed her gloves and used hand sanitizer before putting on clean gloves. CNA B secured the tabs on each side of Resident #32's brief and pulled up the sheet to cover the resident. CNA B removed her gloves and washed her hands in Resident #32's restroom. When asked about hand hygiene practice, CNA B stated she should have washed her hands or used hand sanitizer each time she took off the dirty gloves. CNA B stated it was important because it helped prevent spreading bacteria on the resident's body and to other residents. <BR/>In an interview on 02/12/2025 at 10:28 AM, LVN A stated it was important to prevent the spread of germs during incontinence care because it could cause a UTI (infection in the kidneys or bladder). LVN A stated staff should always sanitize or wash their hands after removing dirty gloves and before putting on clean gloves. <BR/>In an interview on 02/12/2025 at 10:40 AM, the ADON stated it was important to follow hand hygiene measures and prevent the spread of germs and bacteria to other residents. She stated she would in-service staff. <BR/>In an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:20 PM, the DON stated her expectation was for staff to use hand sanitizer or wash their hands before putting on clean gloves and after removing dirty gloves. The DON stated there could be a tiny hole in the glove that was unnoticed. She stated staff could introduce bacteria while providing incontinence care and spread bacteria to the next resident they provided care for. She stated proper hand hygiene was an important infection control measure. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy Briefs/Underpads, revised January 2024, reflected when providing incontinence care to Remove gloves, sanitize hands and replace with clean gloves.<BR/>

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for medication storage.<BR/>The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 didn't have a box of Mucinex (medication used to treat the symptoms of cough and congestion) tablets left unattended and unsecured on the bedside table on 02/11/2025.<BR/>This failure could place residents at risk for misappropriation of property, risk for accidents, hazards, and not receiving therapeutic effects of the medication. <BR/>The findings include:<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Face Sheet, dated 02/11/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included Covid-19 (respiratory illness caused by a virus) and acute respiratory failure (respiratory condition that makes it difficult to breathe).<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Quarterly MDS (tool used to assess health and functional capabilities status of resident) Assessment, dated 01/05/2025, reflected Resident #40 had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 07. Section I did not reflect current treatment for a pulmonary (lung related) condition.<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Physician Orders, dated 03/13/2022, reflected Mucinex D 60-600 mg tablet extended release 12 hr 600mg, oral, Twice A Day - PRN. <BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 01/05/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for progression/onset of opportunistic infection related to Covid-19 virus positive status (per CDC recommendation) - Resolved. One intervention was to administer medications and treatments as ordered. <BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Continuity of Care, dated 02/14/2025, reflected the last dose of Mucinex D was administered by facility staff on 09/19/2023 at 01:58 PM. <BR/>Observation and interview on 02/11/2025 AT 10:46 AM revealed an open box of Mucinex on Resident #40's bedside table. The box of Mucinex was in a plastic organizer that held the resident's personal items. Resident #40 stated her family member brought the box of Mucinex to her a long time ago, but she had not taken any of the medication. <BR/>During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 10:53 AM, the ADON stated the medication should not have been in Resident #40's room. She stated an assessment and physician's order was required for a resident to self-administer medication and Resident #40 did not have an assessment included in her chart to self-administer medication. The ADON stated the resident could have taken the medication and staff also gave the medication to the resident. The ADON stated we do not want her to overmedicate. The ADON removed the medication from Resident #40's room.<BR/>During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 11:01 AM, LVN C stated she had not seen the Mucinex in Resident #40's room. LVN C stated the Mucinex should not have been in Resident #40's room. She stated the resident might take more than the directions said and staff would not know. LVN C stated residents could only have medication in their room if the doctor authorized it. <BR/>During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:20 PM, the DON stated sometimes family brought things to residents and staff did not know about. The DON stated the administrator contacted Resident #40's family and asked them not to bring medication to the resident's room. The DON stated another resident could go in Resident #40's room and take the medication. The DON stated a resident was required to pass an assessment and have a physician's order to self-administer medication. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy Self-Administration of Medications , revised February 2021, reflected Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration are turned over to the nurse in charge for return to the family or responsible party.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for medication storage.<BR/>The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 didn't have a box of Mucinex (medication used to treat the symptoms of cough and congestion) tablets left unattended and unsecured on the bedside table on 02/11/2025.<BR/>This failure could place residents at risk for misappropriation of property, risk for accidents, hazards, and not receiving therapeutic effects of the medication. <BR/>The findings include:<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Face Sheet, dated 02/11/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included Covid-19 (respiratory illness caused by a virus) and acute respiratory failure (respiratory condition that makes it difficult to breathe).<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Quarterly MDS (tool used to assess health and functional capabilities status of resident) Assessment, dated 01/05/2025, reflected Resident #40 had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 07. Section I did not reflect current treatment for a pulmonary (lung related) condition.<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Physician Orders, dated 03/13/2022, reflected Mucinex D 60-600 mg tablet extended release 12 hr 600mg, oral, Twice A Day - PRN. <BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 01/05/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for progression/onset of opportunistic infection related to Covid-19 virus positive status (per CDC recommendation) - Resolved. One intervention was to administer medications and treatments as ordered. <BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Continuity of Care, dated 02/14/2025, reflected the last dose of Mucinex D was administered by facility staff on 09/19/2023 at 01:58 PM. <BR/>Observation and interview on 02/11/2025 AT 10:46 AM revealed an open box of Mucinex on Resident #40's bedside table. The box of Mucinex was in a plastic organizer that held the resident's personal items. Resident #40 stated her family member brought the box of Mucinex to her a long time ago, but she had not taken any of the medication. <BR/>During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 10:53 AM, the ADON stated the medication should not have been in Resident #40's room. She stated an assessment and physician's order was required for a resident to self-administer medication and Resident #40 did not have an assessment included in her chart to self-administer medication. The ADON stated the resident could have taken the medication and staff also gave the medication to the resident. The ADON stated we do not want her to overmedicate. The ADON removed the medication from Resident #40's room.<BR/>During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 11:01 AM, LVN C stated she had not seen the Mucinex in Resident #40's room. LVN C stated the Mucinex should not have been in Resident #40's room. She stated the resident might take more than the directions said and staff would not know. LVN C stated residents could only have medication in their room if the doctor authorized it. <BR/>During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:20 PM, the DON stated sometimes family brought things to residents and staff did not know about. The DON stated the administrator contacted Resident #40's family and asked them not to bring medication to the resident's room. The DON stated another resident could go in Resident #40's room and take the medication. The DON stated a resident was required to pass an assessment and have a physician's order to self-administer medication. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy Self-Administration of Medications , revised February 2021, reflected Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration are turned over to the nurse in charge for return to the family or responsible party.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for one (Resident #92) of 11 residents reviewed for resident rights. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure Restorative Aide (RA) I did not stand over Resident #92 while assisting the resident with her meal in the 300-hall dining room.<BR/>This failure could affect residents who require assistance with activities of daily living and place them at risk of feeling rushed to eat or not interested in eating which could result in weight loss and decreased psycho-social well-being. <BR/>The findings include:<BR/>Observation on 12/19/23 at 12:53 p.m., revealed, in the 300-hall dining room, RA I stood next to Resident #92 trying to put food into her mouth and the resident's left hand went up to block getting the food. RA I took two steps back and said I surrender I surrender then she stood up to the table standing next to Resident #92 for approximately 5 minutes without saying or doing anything and Resident #92 moved her food around on her plate with her fork then. RA I left the dining room and went to talk to a nurse on the hallway. <BR/>Review of Resident #92's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and sometimes understood others with a BIMS score of 04 (Severe cognitive impairment), used a manual wheelchair and walker, needed some help with eating and had no upper or lower extremity impairments. <BR/>Review of Resident #92's Care Plan printed 12/21/23 revealed, Problem start date: 11/16/23 Dehydration/Fluid Maintenance .11/01/23 nutritional status .Resident is at risk for impaired nutrition related to a change in environment .11/01/23 ADL's resident need assistance with ADL care .resident will get care needs met through next review period .I need no supervision assistance with eating, I need 1 person staff support with eating. <BR/>Interview on 12/21/23 at 1:05 pm, RA I stated on Tuesday 12/19/23 she was assisting the residents with their meals in the dining room and Resident #92 was very confused and was trying to feed another resident. She stated she was just trying to keep Resident #92 from giving her food to another resident and gave Resident #92 a piece of cake. She stated she was standing up while giving Resident #92 her cake because she was passing out drinks to the other residents also. She stated Resident #92 did not need assistance with eating her meals, but she was not eating and was only trying to encourage her to eat her dessert. She stated Resident #92 was moving around a lot and the reason why she was standing next to Resident #92. She stated yesterday 12/20/23, the DON called her and wrote her up because there was a complaint that she shoved food into Resident #92's mouth. She stated she would never treat the residents wrong and stated standing up feeding the residents was disrespectful. <BR/>Interview on 12/21/23 at 1:31 pm, the DON stated she heard RA I stood next to Resident #92 while feeding her and she should not have done that. She stated a staff standing up feeding the residents could cause a resident to lose their appetite and not make their mealtime enjoyable. She stated it could also show a sign of disrespect and added the staff were not supposed to standup to feed the residents. <BR/>Interview on 12/20/23 at 2:16 pm, the ED stated they had spoken to RA I about the matter and added her expectation for feeding residents was for the staff to do it with dignity and at their own pace and at eye level with the residents. <BR/>Record Review of the Facility's Assistance with meals policy revised March 2022 revealed, Policy Statement: Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident .Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Dining room residents: 3. Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity, for example a. not standing over residents while assisting them with their meals .

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out the activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (Residents #35, #42, #312) of 11 residents reviewed for ADL care. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure Residents #35, #42, and #312 were shaved and hair was combed.<BR/>The facility failed to document Resident #42's refusal for hygiene care including shaving and interventions, in his nurse progress notes. <BR/>These failures could place residents at risk of losing their dignity and self-worth making them susceptible to skin and scalp infections which could lead health decline and decreased psycho-social well-being. <BR/>Findings include:<BR/>1) Review of Resident #35's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed an [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE] with minimum hearing difficulty and a BIMS Score of 01 (Severe cognitive impairment), use of a wheelchair and substantial/maximal assistance with Personal hygiene. <BR/>Review of Resident #35's Care Plan did not reveal a Care Plan for ADL care. <BR/>Record review of Resident #35's December 2023 TAR revealed an order for Shower/Bed bath 1st shift Tuesday- Thursday- Saturday, once a day on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday .Nurse to delegate shower or bed bath and verify via EMR that shower has been administer today .Thursday 12/14/23 was initialed by LVN J .Saturday 12/16/23 was initialed by LVN J .Tuesday 12/19/23 was initialed by LVN K and Thursday 12/21/23 was initialed by LVN J.<BR/>Review of Resident #35's Shower Sheet undated revealed, CNA L showered Resident #35 without a charge nurse signature and the forwarded to DON section was unchecked .12/19/23 resident was showered by unknown staff signature and no nurse signature and the forwarded to DON was unchecked .12/12/23 he had a bed bath that was not signed by a nurse and the forwarded to DON section was unchecked. <BR/>Observation and interview on 12/18/23 at 2:26 pm, Resident #35 had &frac12; inch of facial hair on his face and hair and was uneven in length. He stated the last time he was shaved was a month ago and added he asked to be shaved and the staff said they did not have enough time. <BR/>Observation on 12/19/23 at 1:29 pm, Resident #35 was shaved and no longer had a beard. <BR/>2) Review of Resident #42's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to this facility10/28/20 with minimum difficulty hearing and impaired vision and BIMS score of 02 (severe cognitive impairment) , did not reject care, upper and lower extremity impairments and dependent with personal hygiene (combing hair, shaving) and took anti-anxiety and anti-depression medications. <BR/>Review of Resident #42's Care Plan edited today (12/21/23) by MDS Coordinator M revealed, Problem date 04/06/21: Resident is at risk for self-induced injury related to resistance to care. Resident frequently resists car with combativeness due to blindness .Resident will be free from injury related to resistive behavior thru next review .actively involve the resident in care express willingness to adjust regimen .the resident need assistance with daily ADL care .resident will have daily care needs met through next review period .I need total assistance with showers/bathing .by ADON Q problem start date: 12/20/23 (yesterday): Resident #42 resists care (blood work, taking medications, ADL assistance) .Resident #2 will make an informed choice about the benefits of care, options in care and possible consequences/outcomes for resisting care .actively involve Resident #42 in care. Explore alternative care options with resident Express willingness to adjust regimen, allow Resident #42 to choose options (would you like to bathe in the daytime or evenings. <BR/>Review of Resident #42's December 2023 TAR revealed an order for: Showers/Bed bath 2nd shift Tuesday-Thursday-Saturday .frequency once a day on Monday- Wednesday- Friday .Special instructions: Nurse to delegate shower/bed bath and verify via EMR that shower/bed bath has been administered today .Friday 12/15/23 initialed by LVN J and Monday 12/18/23 initialed by LVN K .Wednesday 12/2/23 by LVN D<BR/>Review of Resident #42's shower sheet undated revealed CNA L showered Resident #42 without a charge nurse signature and the forwarded to DON section was unchecked .12/19/23 refused and no nurse signature and forwarded to DON was unchecked .12/12/23 refused and no nurse signature and the forwarded to DON was unchecked. <BR/>Review of Resident #42's Nurse Progress Notes revealed no documentation of refusal of showers or shavings and interventions, but on 09/23/23 at 6:33 am He refused his eyedrops 06/23/23 at 10:59 am He refused incontinent care. <BR/>Observation on 12/18/23 at 2:27 pm, Resident #42 was asleep, and his beard appeared to be approximately one inch long, thick and tightly curled up and matted along several areas of his face. <BR/>Observation and interview on 12/19/23 at 1:30 pm, Resident #42's beard was thick and tightly curled up and matted. Resident #42 stated I just needed to get some clippers, where were they at because I would like to get shaved. Resident #42 rubbed his beard with his right hand and stated not getting shaved made him feel bad and that the staff did not do shit. He stated he was showered regularly but he had not asked to be shaved but would start asking them to shave him. After alerting ADON B to Resident #42's room he told ADON B that he would like to be shaved and she stated she would assist. <BR/>Observation and interview on 12/20/23 at 10:08 am, Resident #42 was shaved and stated he was shaved yesterday 12/19/23 and added the last time he was shaved was two weeks ago. <BR/>3) Review of Resident #312s admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE], usually made self-understood, impaired vision with a BIMS score of 13 (No cognitive impairment), partial/moderate personal hygiene assistance (helper did less than half the effort, helper lifted, held or supported trunk or limbs but provided less than half the effort. <BR/>Review of Resident #312's Care Plan dated 12/13/23 revealed, Resident needed assistance with daily ADL care .Resident will have daily care needs met through next review period .I need extensive assistance with bathing/showering. I need 1 person staff support with bathing/showering .<BR/>Review of Resident #312's Shower Sheets revealed on 12/14/23 an unknown staff showered Resident #312 with an unknown nurse signature and forwarded to DON was unchecked .12/17/23 showered by unknown staff and an unknown nurse signed and forwarded to DON was unchecked .12/19/23 Refused and signed by an unknown nurse and forward to DON was unchecked. <BR/>Observation and interview on 12/19/23 at 1:15 pm, Resident #312 had 1 &frac12; inches of facial hair and his hair on his head was sticking straight up. He was sitting up in his wheelchair and stated being at this facility was all new to him and he would like to shave himself because he did not like all of that hair on his face. <BR/>Observation and interview on 12/20/23 at 11:01 am, Resident #312 was lying in bed with approximately 1 &frac12; inches of facial hair and the hair on his head was sticking straight up and went in different directions. He stated he admitted to this facility last week and the last time he was shaved was a week in a half ago and added he was struggling and was barely able to move and needed more staff assistance. After LVN T was alerted to go to Resident #312's room, Resident #312 stated he would like to be shaved and LVN T stated he would assist. <BR/>Observation on 12/20/23 at 12:20 pm, LVN T wheeled Resident #312 into the 300-hall dining room, and he had 1 &frac12; inches of facial hair and his hair on his head was sticking up in the back and was going in different directions. <BR/>Interview on 12/19/23 at 2:00 pm, ADON B stated she shaved Resident #42 today (12/19/23) after she spoke to him.<BR/>Interview on 12/20/23 at 10:46 am, LVN J stated no one told her Resident #42 refused to shave. She stated the CNAs were supposed to document on the shower sheets if the residents refused care so that the nurses would know to go and ask if they wanted to shave. She stated if a resident refused care, it depended on changing the staff or time of day for ADL care. She stated she worked last Saturday 12/16/23 and the CNA working that day did not tell her Resident #42 refused the be shaved. She stated the residents were supposed to get shaved when showered or bed bathed. She stated she did not notice Resident #35 or #42 had any facial hair when she last worked Saturday 12/16/23. She stated, if she saw a thick growth of facial hair on the resident's faces, she would let that resident's CNA know they needed to be shaved and would shave them herself if the CNA's were busy.<BR/>Interview on 12/20/23 at 2:40 pm, ADON B stated she shaved Resident #42 sometimes and stated he was normally shaved on his shower days. She stated the last time she shaved him was two weeks ago, and added if residents were not shaved regularly could cause skin infections and cause food to get in left in the beards. She stated the CNA's, charge nurses and nurse managers were responsible for ensuring the residents were shaved when needed and added she was his family member and he usually complied with ADL care once she talked to him. <BR/>Interview on 12/20/23 at 4:07 pm, Admissions Nurse O stated she saw Resident #42 getting showered about 2 weeks ago and that CNA U was able to get him showered. She stated she was not sure if he was shaved recently and added he had some visual impairment and assisted him with his meals. She stated CNA U was good with getting Resident #42 to comply with ADL care. She stated Resident #42's cognition was good and at times he called out for his family member to come to his room. She stated staff said Resident #42 was mean and refused care, but she had not witnessed that. <BR/>Interview on 12/21/23 at 1:00 pm, ADON N stated when residents refused to shower or shave, they documented it in the nurse progress notes.<BR/>Interview on 12/21/23 at 1:31 pm, the DON stated Resident #312 was a new admit who was showered once since admitting but last Monday (12/18/23) he refused to shower. She stated today (12/21/23) he was wanting to be shaved and they were able to shave him today (12/21/23). She stated he admitted with a lot of facial hair and had one shower and was not sure why he was not shaved then. She stated after speaking to the HHSC Surveyor she realized today (12/21/23) they needed to do more and changed his shower day to mornings and not on his dialysis treatment days. She stated the staff needed to add shaving to the residents' shower sheets. She stated although Resident #42 refused care, she had never tried to get Resident #42 to shave or shower and was not aware Resident #35 preferred to be shaved. She stated they needed to offer shaves even if the residents refused showers. She stated her expectations was for the staff to let her know when Resident #42 and other residents refused care. She stated her expectation for ADL care was for it to be done effectively and said she did not want the residents or their rooms to smell. She stated when Resident #42 refused care, usually ADON B was able to get him to comply. She stated if ADL care was not done it could cause residents to get an infection and not be happy.<BR/>Interview on 12/21/23 at 2:16 pm, the ED stated she was not aware of any grooming issues with Residents #35, #42 and #312. She stated ADL care was needed to maintain the resident's independence as much as they could with staff assistance including total care. She stated the DON was responsible for ensuring ADL care was done properly, <BR/>Record review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living, Supporting policy revised March 2018 revealed, Policy Statement: Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene .Policy and Interpretation and Implementation 1. Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services to ensure that their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are unavoidable .(3) refuses care and treatment to restore and maintain functional abilities .he or she has been offered alternative interventions to minimize further decline and c) the refusal and information are documented in the resident's clinical record .2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the care plan, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care) .4. If residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem and not just assume the resident is refusing or declining care. Approaching the resident in a different way or different time or having another staff member speak with the resident may be appropriate .7. The resident's response to interventions will be monitored, evaluated and revised as appropriate .

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (Resident #24) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. <BR/>The facility failed to appropriately identify Resident #24's skin injury, obtain, and provide appropriate treatment.<BR/>The facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #24's new facility acquired wound to the left buttock and the deep tissue injury to the left heel. <BR/>This failures placed residents at risk for skin break down, multiple skin injury, and a decline in quality of life. <BR/>Findings include: <BR/>Review of Resident #24's face sheet dated 12/21/2023 revealed a 90-years-old female admitted to the facility 04/05/1922 with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident #24's diagnoses included: Parkinson's, (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement) dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), major depression, dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing), lack of coordination, muscle weakness and chronic kidney disease. <BR/>Review of Resident #24's care plan dated 12/21/2023 reflected, Problem Start Date: 12/19/2023 Category: Integumentary System (Skin) WOUNDS TREATMENT LEFT BUTTOCK: RESIDENT IS AT RISK FOR COMPLICATIONS AND WORSENING OF EXISTING WOUND(S) (PRESSURE ULCER, SURGICAL WOUND) R/T IMPAIRED MOBILITY, AND BODY SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES IN ABILITY TO HEAL. Goal, RESIDENT'S ULCER WILL DECREASE IN SIZE BY NEXT REVIEW. Intervention, APPLY DRESSINGS AND WOUND CARE PER MD ORDER: DATE, TIME, AND INITIAL WOUND DRESSING. DOCUMENT IN NURSING PROGRESS NOTES AND WOUND ASSESSMENT RESIDENTS TOLERANCE TO THE PROCEDURE. Problem Start Date: 04/21/2022 Category: Integumentary System (Skin) (Resident #24) is at risk for pressure ulcers and other skin related injuries due to incontinence. (Resident #24) will maintain skin integrity without new skin related injuries over the next review period. Approach Start Date: 04/21/2022 Observe skin for redness and breakdown during routine care.<BR/>Review of the MDS dated [DATE] reflected she had a BIMS score of 9, and required maximum assistance with activities of daily living. Further reflected the resident did not have a skin issue and she was a high risk of developing a pressure ulcer/injury. Skin and ulcer/injury treatments was for pressure reducing device for bed. <BR/>Review of Physician order with a start date of 12/19/2023 for wound prevention to turn and offload/pad pressure points while in bed 6 times per shift. Cleanse open wound of the left buttock with normal saline, pat dry, apply anasept gel and cover with boarded island dressing daily and PRN. Apply skin prep to left heel daily. <BR/>Observation and interview on 12/18/23 at 03:45 PM, Resident #24 was in bed, well groomed, and the room was clean. Resident #24 stated she had a wound on her bottom area that the facility did not treat, she stated the staff only applied cream. Resident #24 stated the staff knew of the wound and she had told one of the staff members (CNA A). Resident #24 stated she started feeling like she had a wound on her bottom about 2-3 weeks ago because it stung while she was being provided care. <BR/>Observation on 12/19/23 at 12:43 PM, during incontinent care for Resident #24 revealed she had a open area to the left buttock. The wound did not have a dressing and the wound bed was red, and no tunneling was noted. <BR/>In an interview on 12/19/23 at 12:59 PM, CNA C revealed she took care of Resident #24. CNA C stated she had worked in the facility for two weeks and for one week she had taken care of the resident. CNA C stated Resident #24 was alert and oriented, she was incontinent of bowel and bladder. CNA C stated when she started taking care of Resident #24 the resident had the open area to the left buttock and after she cleaned the resident, she applied barrier cream. CNA C stated she had not informed the charge nurse of the open area because when she started working with the resident, the resident already had the open area, and she assumed the charge nurse was aware of the open area. CNA C stated when there were any skin issues, she was supposed to notify the charge nurse immediately. <BR/>In an interview on 12/19/23 at 01:18 PM, LVN D stated she was the charge nurse for Resident #24. LVN D stated she was not aware Resident #24 had any skin issues and no one had reported the resident having any wounds. LVN D stated Resident #24 had a history of a wound that had resolved about one year ago. <BR/>Observation and interview on 12/19/23 at 01:21 PM, LVN D assessed Resident #24's bottom area and she stated it was an open area and she was going to inform the wound care nurse to assess the open area. LVN D informed the wound care nurse. LVN D reviewed the clinical records and stated Resident #24's weekly assessments had not been completed since October. LVN D stated the 7pm - 7am charge nurse was to complete Resident #24's weekly skin assessments. LVN D stated the aides were to inform the charge nurse of any skin issues and the charge nurse will assess the resident, then the charge nurse will inform the resident's responsible party and wound care nurse. <BR/>In an interview on 12/19/23 at 01:38 PM, CNA E stated normally she did not take care of Resident #24. She stated she took care of Resident #24 about two weeks ago and her bottom area was intact, but yesterday when she was taking care of the resident the resident reported burning sensation on her bottom. While CNA E was providing incontinent care to Resident #24, she noted the resident with an open area on her bottom. The open area was not bleeding and did not look like it was a new wound. CNA E cleaned Resident #24 and applied barrier cream. CNA E stated she didn't recall informing the charge nurse directly of the open area because it did not look like it was a new wound, and assumed the nurse was aware of the wound. CNA E stated if the resident had any skin issue the aide was expected to report to the charge nurse immediately. <BR/>In an interview on 12/19/23 at 04:00 PM, LVN F stated she was the wound care nurse and she had been completing wound care in the facility for more than one year. LVN F stated Resident #24 was alert and oriented and she was able to voice her needs. LVN F stated Resident #24 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and she had an history of pressure ulcers that had resolved. LVN F stated the charge nurses were the ones to complete weekly skin assessments, and if there was any skin issue, they would inform LVN F (wound care nurse) and she will complete the skin assessment. LVN F said she was not aware Resident #24 had a wound prior to today. LVN F completed Resident #24's head to toe assessment and noted a wound on the left buttock and measured 3cm x1.6cm x 0.2cm, no drainage , no foul odor and the wound bed was red, LVN F stated only the wound care doctor was to stage the wound. LVN F also noted redness to her left heel 2cm x2cm non-bleachable. LVN F then informed the wound care doctor of the skin issues with new orders wound treatment orders. LVN F stated the wound required treatment because it was an open area and without treatment the wound could deteriorate or be infected. LVN F stated the aides were supposed to report any skin issues to the charge nurse or the wound care nurse. <BR/>In an interview on 12/19/23 at 04:32 PM, CNA G stated she was taking care of Resident #24. CNA G stated Resident #24 was alert and oriented and she was able to voice her needs. Resident #24 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and she required total assistance with activities of daily living. CNA G stated she noted redness on Resident #24's bottom area on 12/15/23, she was off on 12/16/23 and when she took care of the resident on 12/17/23 the bottom area looked like the skin was peeling off. CNA G stated she did not inform the charge nurse of Resident #24's skin issue because she was too busy. CNA G stated she was expected to report any skin issues to the charge nurse immediately, so that the charge nurse would assess the resident. <BR/>In an interview on 12/19/23 at 05:21 PM, ADON B stated she was the unit manager for the fourth floor and oversees the care of the residents. ADON B stated Resident #24 required assistance with activities of daily living and she was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #24 was at high at risk for pressure ulcer because she was not ambulatory, and she had a history of pressure ulcers. ADON stated she was not aware of Resident #24 having any skin issues. ADON B stated the aides were to report to the charge nurses of any skin issues and the charge nurses were to complete the skin assessment. ADON B stated the charge nurses were expected to complete weekly skin assessment to be able to notice if the resident had any skin issues. ADON B stated she was responsible to do a follow up and make sure the weekly skin assessments were completed but she did not, she stated I Just missed it, i am not gonna lie to you. ADON B stated when the aides noted redness/open area on Resident #24's bottom they were supposed to report immediately to the charge nurse. ADON B stated the charge nurse failed to complete the weekly skin assessments and the aides failed to report a skin issue. Open wound on the resident without proper treatments could lead to the wound getting worse and or being infected. <BR/>In an interview on 12/20/23 at 12:28 PM with the DON she stated she was made aware of Resident #24's wound, prior to yesterday she was no aware of the wound. DON stated the facility completed a skin sweep and no new wounds were noted. DON stated she expected the aides to report any skin issues they noted on the resident and document. DON also expected the charge nurses to complete weekly skin assessments to identify the resident skin issues, thus being able to intervene timely. The DON further stated, if the resident had a wound the wound care Dr had to be notified so as treatment could be started to prevent the wound from getting worse or being infected. <BR/>In an interview on 12/21/23 at 08:24 AM, RN H stated she took care of Resident #24 on the 7p-7a shift. The resident was alert and oriented and she was able to voice her needs. Resident #24 required assistance with activities of daily living, and she was incontinent of bowel and bladder. RN H stated Resident #24's weekly skin assessment was scheduled on the night shift, and the charge nurses were expected to complete the weekly assessments. RN H stated if the charge nurse was not able to complete the scheduled weekly skin assessment, they were to inform the oncoming nurse, but she stated she did not inform the oncoming nurse or management that she was not able to complete the weekly skin assessment. RN H stated the weekly skin assessment was to check and see if the resident had any skin issues so it could be addressed promptly. RN H stated if Resident #24's weekly skin assessment was completed the resident wound could have been identified and treatment initiated. RN H stated open wounds that are not treated could deteriorate or being infected. <BR/>In an interview on 12/21/23 at 09:42 AM, the ED stated she was not aware Resident #24 having any skin issue. The ED stated if the resident had any wound or skin issues, the staff were to intervene and notify the wound care Dr so treatments could be provided to prevent the wound from deteriorating or being infected. The ED stated the facility expected the aides to report timely of any skin issues and the charge nurses to complete weekly skin assessment per scheduled. The ED stated if the resident had a new wound the treatment nurse had to be made aware so she could assess the skin issue timely. <BR/>In an interview on 12/21/23 at 01:22 PM, the wound care Dr, stated she was in the facility weekly to assess the progress of the wounds and change treatment orders if need be. She stated she was not aware of Resident #24's wound until Tuesday (12/19/23). After assessing Resident #24 she stated the resident had two skin issues, one was on her left buttock that was a skin trauma, looked fresh and she was not able to determine when it started, she stated it was not a pressure ulcer. The second issue was a deep tissue injury to the left heel, it was not open. She stated she already put orders in place. The Dr stated she expected the staff to report any skin issues to her timely for treatment to be started to prevent wound infections or the wound deteriorating. <BR/>Review of the facility policy revised April 2018 and titled Pressure ulcer/skin breakdown - clinical protocol reflected, 1. The nursing staff assess skin and notify MD of any skin issues weekly per facility protocol. 2. In addition, the nurse shall describe and document/report the following. a. Full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue.<BR/>Review of an undated policy titled, Skin assessments must be done weekly; No exceptions!! Reflected, Nurse aides must fill shower sheets daily and report any skin issues to the nurse ASAP. The nurse must then follow up, complete a new skin assessment detailing the new skin issue and put in a new wound care consult. Failure to do so will result in disciplinary action.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to adequately equip to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff for one (Resident #42) of 11 residents reviewed for call lights.<BR/>The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's had a call light device. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure the call light panel system in Resident #42's room worked. <BR/>These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care when requested which could cause a delay in care and services which could result in injury and decline in health and psycho-social well-being. <BR/>Findings included:<BR/>Review of Resident #42's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to this facility 10/28/20 with minimum difficulty hearing and impaired vision and BIMS score of 02 (severe cognitive impairment), upper and lower extremity impairments and dependent with personal hygiene (combing hair, shaving) and took anti-anxiety and anti-depression medications. <BR/>Review of Resident #42's Care Plan dated 11/21/23 revealed he needed assistance with daily ADL care .resident will have daily care needs met through next review period .I am incontinent to bladder and bowel, I need 1 person staff support with mobility, I use a wheelchair device for mobility. <BR/>Observation on 12/20/23 at 10:08 am, Resident #42 did not have a call light button on his side of the room, and he said he was not sure how long it had been missing. <BR/>Interview and observation on 12/20/23 at 10:10 am, the Infection Preventionist LVN V came into Resident #42's room and said she was not aware of his missing call light and maybe it was broken, and never replaced. She stated the CNAs normally told them about any issues with the call lights then within minutes she returned and plugged in a soft touch call light into the panel, but it did not work. She stated she would have to talk to the Maintenance Director. <BR/>Observation on 12/20/23 at 11:55 am, Resident #42 had a soft touch call light pad over his stomach that was checked and worked. <BR/>Interview on 12/20/23 at 11:32 am, the Maintenance Director stated Resident #42's call light panel was burned out and was replaced and now his call light was working. He stated having five Maintenance assistants and they all checked the call light monthly. He stated he was ultimately responsible for checking to ensure the call lights worked properly and added the call lights were checked before a resident admitted and discharged a facility also. He stated having a maintenance checklist with call lights on the list and added if a resident did not have a call light, they would not be able to get the staff's attention if they were hurting or in pain. He stated he did not think there was anything they could do to prevent this from re-occurring then stated he could make a sheet just for checking call lights and check the call light twice monthly. He stated he used the TELS system for managing maintenance checks but everyone needed to help check the call lights. He stated he was not sure who took Resident #42's call light cord out of the wall and whoever did should have immediately reported it to him or one of his assistants to repair. He stated the last time the call lights were checked was a week or two weeks ago. <BR/>Interview on 12/20/23 at 10:46 am, LVN J stated she was not sure who took Resident #42's call light out of his room and was not aware it was missing until today (12/202/3) and now he had a call light that worked. She stated the call lights should be checked during the resident's nursing rounds every 2 hours, and when needed. She stated if a resident had an issue with a broken call light, they would normally replace it and if there was still a problem, notify the Maintenance Department. <BR/>Interview on 12/20/23 at 4:07 pm, Admissions Nurse O stated they were not sure who removed Resident #42's call light and added the call lights were supposed to be checked every time the nursing staff checked on the residents. She stated the call lights were supposed to be within reach and working properly. She stated as of today (12/20/23), they did Inservice trainings with the staff to ensure the call lights worked and within the resident's reach. She stated they did call light checks for all of the rooms and there were no other rooms affected. She stated the importance of having call lights was to meet the resident's needs. <BR/>Interview on 12/21/23 at 12:40 pm, ADON B stated they were all supposed to make sure the residents' call lights worked and were within their reach and was not sure what happened to Resident #42's call light. She stated if a resident did not have their call lights, they would not be able to reach the nurse when they needed things, they could fall, and several things could happen to the resident. She stated the plan to prevent this from happening again was to ensure the CNA's made their residents round each shift to ensure the call lights were in place. She stated they re-educated the staff about checking the call lights and reporting if they were broken to the Maintenance Department, when first discovered. She stated the step to reporting maintenance problems was to call the front desk to contact the Maintenance Department or they could call Maintenance themselves. <BR/>Interview on 12/21/23 at 1:31 pm, the DON Resident #42 not aware his call light was missing until HHS brought it to their attention, she stated they checked the whole building room by room and there were no issues with any other call lights. She stated they were not able to determine who took the old call light out of Resident #42's the room and added the staff were trained within the day or two on being sure they checked the call light functioning and if they were broken, they needed to notify the charge nurse, ADON and call maintenance. She stated her expectations for call light checks was for everyone including the Department Head Ambassadors were to check them. She stated ultimately the Maintenance Director was responsible for ensuring the call lights worked. She stated if the residents did not have call lights, anything could happen, like a change of condition. <BR/>Interview on 12/21/23 at 2:16 pm, the ED stated she not sure what happened to Resident #42's missing call light and malfunctioning call light panel but they were resolved now. She stated the Maintenance Director was responsible for ensuring the call lights worked and the direct staff were to also check them daily to ensure they were working and if the call lights did not work the staff needed to put in a work order immediately to get it fixed. <BR/>Review of the facility's Call Light Inspection Policy undated revealed, Purpose: Purpose The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the call light system is operational and functional for every resident, especially during transitions such as admission and discharge .General Guidelines .3. Report Defects: If any issues or defects are found during inspections, they must be immediately reported to the maintenance team .4. Documentation: Document all inspections, including the date, time, and outcome (e.g., working condition or defects found), in the maintenance logbook provided for this purpose .Documentation: 1. Record all inspection activities, findings, and actions taken in the logbook .2. Review the logbook periodically to identify any recurring issues or trends that may require further attention or action .By implementing and adhering to this policy, we aim to maintain a safe and responsive environment for our residents by ensuring that the call light system is always operational and functional . <BR/>Review of the facility's Answer the Call light policy Revised 2022 revealed, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and need .General Guideline: 4. Be sure the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times .5. Ensure the call light is assessable to the resident when in bed .6. Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly .

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs in order attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two residents (Resident #1, and Resident #2) of ten residents reviewed for care plans. <BR/>The facility failed to create a care plan addressing Resident #1's behaviors. <BR/>The facility failed to create a care plan addressing Resident #2's PTSD and anger outbursts. <BR/>This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.<BR/>Findings included:<BR/>Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/20/23, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on 10/24/23, and had diagnoses of congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and unspecified depression and depressive episodes. <BR/>Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/23/23, reflected she had a BIMS score of 11, indicating possible moderate cognitive impairment, and usually able to understand others, and to be understood by others. Resident #1 continuously exhibited inattention and disorganized thinking during the assessment period. She was not noted to have exhibited any behavioral symptoms during the assessment period. Resident #1 was required substantial to complete assistance of staff for most of her ADLs, but was able to feed herself independently, and to perform oral care with minimal staff assistance. <BR/>Review of care plans dated 07/27/23 for Resident #1 reflected, psychosocial well-being, which addressed a risk for increased behavioral expressions due to a new environment. No care plans for resident behaviors were reflected. <BR/>Review of a nursing note, dated 07/19/23, reflected Resident #1 refused to be tested for tuberculosis. She was counselled by the nurse on it, and informed she would have to talk to facility management about it. The resident continued to refuse and told the nurse she would have to look into it. <BR/>Review of a nursing note dated 07/22/23, reflected Resident #1 refused to allow the lab to collect urine for lab work.<BR/>Review of a nursing note, dated 07/23/23, reflected resident #1 refused to allow wound care, insisting that she did not have wounds. The note reflects when the nurse asked if they could assess her, she stated you are not a doctor I don't want you to check my body.<BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 07/23/23, reflected Resident alert and responsive with no complaints of pain, no SIS of distress noted, resident had several outbursts of yelling/screaming at staff, refusing care/refusing medication. Resdeint (sic) was very insistent on C.N.A. working evening shift to double brief her and place triple pads underneath her buttocks. Resident threatened C.N.A. and Nures (sic) that she would personally make sure that we would lose our jobs because we refused to place pads and briefs per her instructions. Staff was unable to calm resident down and we excused ourselves from her room. C.N.A. stated that resident hit her during brief change.<BR/>Review of a nursing note, dated 07/24/23, reflected Resident #1 had called 911, and EMS staff was present. The note reflects Resident #1 yelling and saying she had not been fed or changed for days, and her ankle hurt, and insisted EMS staff be there to observe her asking staff to change her, so they could not say she refused. The note reflects the resident had not called for any assistance or pain medication from CNAs or her nurse, prior to this incident. It was noted that Resident #1 spoke very rudely to EMS staff, and they left the room, after which the nurse and CNA cleaned and changed her, and EMS placed her on a stretcher and took her to the hospital. During this time, Resident #1 stated she was going to the hospital because she just didn't want to be wet. <BR/>Review of nursing note, dated 07/25/23, reflected Resident #1 reflected she returned from the hospital with no new orders, and told the facility staff she had demanded the hospital staff return her to the facility because they were not doing anything for her. <BR/>Review of nursing note, dated 07/25/23, reflected Resident #1 was non-compliant with care.<BR/>Review of nursing note, dated 07/26/23, reflected Resident #1 refused her insulin. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 07/27/23, reflected Resident refused to be changed. Night aide went twice and she said, leave me alone. Charge nurse went to talk to resident about getting incontinent care, and she still refused to be changed.<BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 07/27/23, reflected Resident often misrepresents reality and confuses time periods. This note documented a conversation at length with the resident about her refusals of care, medications, and therapy, and how detrimental to her health they were. Resident #1 verbally indicated she understood, but it was her right to refuse care. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 07/29/23, reflected ( .) the resident is demanding and unreasonable complainant. when the staff asked for care/change, the resident said she does not want, later the nurse answered the call light and the resident wants change, the nurse notified CNA, then the CNA said that the resident refused change, the nurse talked to the resident to be change and then accepted the instruction and changed.<BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/07/23, reflected Total care per staff. Transfers per Hoyer lift. Resident is noncompliant with safety. Attempts to transfers self to toilet and w/c. Educated on safety.<BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/08/23, reflected Resident #1 refused care, and refused to allow wound nurse to assess and treat the blister on her hip. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/08/23, reflected the charge nurse from the previous shift reported to the nurse that the resident had a blister on the right thigh. When the nurse attempted to assess and treat, the resident again refused and attempted to argue with the nurse and told the nurse to get out of her room. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/09/23, reflected Resident #1 refused to allow assessment and care of the blister on her hip.<BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/10/23, reflected Resident #1 refused to allow assessment and care of the blister on her hip by the wound care physician.<BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08//23, reflected Resident #1 refused to allow staff to use mechanical lift for her transfer, and insisted she was going to get herself out of bed. Staff counseled her on the danger of this, and she verbalized understanding, then proceeded to attempt to transfer herself and fell on her knees. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/11/23, reflected Resident #1 refused to keep the bandage on the blister on her hip, and stated I'm a doctor and I know it doesn't need to be covered.<BR/>Review of three nursing notes for Resident #1, dated 08/12/23, reflect she refused her medications in spite of multiple attempts by nurse, called 911 five times during one shift, was demanding and attention-seeking, and stated she was a doctor and worked for 911. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/14/23, reflected she was non-compliant with her care, and refused her antibiotic. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/15/23, reflected she was non-compliant with her care, and refused her antibiotic. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/16/23, reflected she continued to refuse her antibiotic. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/17/23, reflected she refused all medications. <BR/>Review of a Social Services note, dated 08/20/23, reflected the resident refused to share a needed code for her Kepro appeal, so staff could complete their part of the appeal, and told the Social Worker to leave the room. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/22/23, reflected she was non-compliant with her care, and refused to listen to reason. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/23/23, reflected she was non-compliant with her care. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 08/28/23, reflected she was non-compliant with her care. <BR/>Review of a nursing note for Resident #1, dated 09/04/23, reflected she was non-compliant with her care, and would not listen to staff. <BR/>Review of a Social Services note for Resident #1, dated 09/08/23, reflected she refused to sign paperwork for the Social Worker. <BR/>Review of a nursing note, dated 09/15/23, reflected the nurse was informed by the NP that the resident was refusing the doxycycline, because It's an antibiotic for dogs and ruins the kidneys. The note says the antibiotic was discontinued and another was prescribed, and the resident was happy with that. <BR/>Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 12/19/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 10/31/23. Resident #2 had a primary admitting diagnosis of repeated falls, and diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and coronary artery disease.<BR/>Review of Resident #2's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he was able to understand and to be understood by others, and had a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #2 exhibited no behaviors or indicators of psychosis during the assessment period Resident #2 required substantial to partial assistance from staff for showers, toileting, and some parts of dressing, but was able eat, and perform oral care and some parts of dressing, with little to no staff assistance. <BR/>Review of Resident #1's care plans reflected a care plan dated 10/18/23 for psychosocial well-being, which addressed a risk for increased behavioral expressions due to a new environment. No care plans for PTSD or anger outbursts were included. <BR/>Review of an admission progress note by the ED, dated 10/18/23, reflected Resident #2's diagnoses included PTSD.<BR/>Review of a nursing progress note by the ADON, dated 10/20/23, reflected a care plan conference was held with Resident #2, at which time he informed the ADON that he preferred his meals in his room, due to his PTSD affecting him intensely in crowds. During the meeting the ADON explained the timing of his medications, and asked for his patience, and that he not have anger outburst of anxiety and anger, because the medications would be administered within an hour on each side of the prescribed time, and the resident expressed understanding of this. <BR/>Review of a nursing progress note for Resident #2, dated 10/21/23, reflected he was agitated and verbally abusive when staff were providing care, and required behavioral adjustments, constant encouraging of behavioral therapies, and medication for mood stabilization. <BR/>Review of a nursing progress note for Resident #2, dated 10/21/23, reflected he had an anger outburst and swore at the receptionist when she entered his room, and refused care. A later note on the same date reflected Resident #2 was apologetic about his earlier cursing at staff. <BR/>Review of a nursing progress note for Resident #2, dated 10/28/23, reflected he expressed dissatisfaction about his care from staff, and wanted his needs attended to immediately, when he made them known. Resident #2 became angry when staff member told him they were with another patient and would attend to him as soon as possible, and started yelling, making phone calls, and pacing. Resident #2 refused his antianxiety medication at this time. <BR/>An interview on 12/20/23 at 11:40 AM, with LVN R revealed she was familiar with Resident #1, and she complained about the food frequently, threatened to sue the facility, and refused her therapy often. <BR/>An interview on 12/20/23 at 12:59 PM, ADON N revealed Resident #2 had bad PTSD and used it as an excuse for his behavior. She said he would call her phone almost continuously, and the facility phone, if his medication did not get delivered to him at the exact time of the prescription. She said if he had an 8:00 AM medication, and it was 8:05 AM, he would think it was late and would start the phone calls. He got upset that his meals did not come before everyone else's, and she suggested he go to the dining room to eat, so he could be served earlier, and she would explain the meal times to him, and he would say Listen, I have bad PTSD over, and over, and would say he could not mix with other people because of it. She said because of it, they would go to the dining room to get his tray, and serve him first on the hall, to prevent him calling her phone, and calling the facility phone, to yell at people. She said if he got mad, he would be impossible to talk to for hours afterwards. She said he wanted crayons one day, and he called everyone about it. She said he would put on his call light, then immediately go to the door, and look down the hall, and if someone was not running to his room, he would become angry, and wait, and as soon as they got there, call the facility phone to yell and complain that nobody was answering his call light, even if the staff was right there to ask what he needed. He would refuse to let them help him, and yell at the person on the phone that nobody was helping him. <BR/>An interview on 12/20/23 at 1:24 PM, Restorative Aide I revealed she remembered Resident #2, and everyone else did too. She said she worked as a Restorative Aide, CNA, and Medication Aide, so she worked with him it multiple ways, and he wanted everything when he wanted it, and would become verbally aggressive toward the staff when he did not get it. She said that he would demand his medication when it was not time, and if a medication was to be given on the hour, he would become very verbally aggressive to the nurse who was giving it to him at two minutes past the hour. She said she also remembered Resident #1, and she was a lot of trouble. She said the resident refused care often, and after many attempts, and she would yell at the staff. She said she called the police more than once, and one time there were about 10 officers in the building because she had called them, but she did not know why she called them. <BR/>An interview on 12/20/23 at 3:04 PM, ADON Q revealed Resident #1 had behaviors and the staff really tried to make her happy, but she was never happy with them. She said she would say she was a doctor, and refuse medications and say they were for dogs, and was very hard to deal with. <BR/>An interview on 12/20/23 at 3:23 PM with ADON B revealed Resident #1 was memorable and when they got a psych consult for her, she kicked her (the psychiatrist) out. She said she refused a lot of care, including wound care, and called 911 multiple times. She would refuse to be changed, repeatedly, then say nobody changed her. She said the facility care planned behaviors, and that the Social Worker, Director of Nursing, and MDS Coordinators did care plans, and that the MDS Coordinators reviewed them to make sure they were complete. <BR/>An interview on 12/20/23 at 3:43 PM, MDS S revealed there should be care plans in place for behaviors and PTSD. She said that when something triggered on the MDS it would be care planned, and if it was an acute care plan, which did not trigger on the MDS, the nurses would be monitoring for behaviors at all times and a nurse who knew how to put a care plan in should have put it in. She said she could not say that someone would be monitoring all progress notes every day, and starting care plans but they did talk about behaviors in their risk meetings regularly and she remembered talking about Resident #1s behaviors, but the main thing she remembered was issues with her discharge paperwork. She said she went into her room and talked to her for a long time about it, and when her therapist went into the room, she sent them away immediately. She said the care plans were important because it gave staff and surveyors a view of who that person was, their behavior, their falls, their skin, wounds, all of it. She said it gave people the resident's story so if you did not know the person, and you read the care plan, you would know about them. She said she did not know why they were not done. <BR/>An interview on 12/21/23 at 9:14 AM, the ED revealed they should care plan PTSD and behaviors at the facility. She said typically the ADONs and MDS coordinators would do the care plans. She said that they talked about resident needs every day in their meetings, so she did not feel those issues got missed by staff, but the care plans should be done to communicate resident needs with the team, and how best to serve the resident. <BR/>An interview on 12/21/23 at 2:30 PM with the Social Worker revealed she did not make the care plans and was only responsible for the care conferences. She said Residents #1 and #1 both had behaviors, and Resident #1 was one of the most difficult people she had every dealt with. She said the mental health care plans were important in order to make sure staff addressed mental health issues. <BR/>An email from the ED on 12/22/23 at 10:05 AM confirmed that both Resident #1 and Resident #2 did not have psych notes, because they had both refused psychiatric services. <BR/>Review of the policy for Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, reflected Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. 2. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required MDS assessment (Admission, Annual or Significant Change in Status), and no more than 21 days after admission. 3. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. ( .) 7. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: a. includes measurable objectives and timeframes; b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including: (1) services that would otherwise be provided for the above, but are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her rights, including the right to refuse treatment; ( .) (3) which professional services are responsible for each element of care; c. includes the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes; d. builds on the resident's strengths; and e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. 8. Services provided for or arranged by the facility and outlined in the comprehensive care plan are: a. provided by qualified persons; b. culturally competent; and c. trauma informed. 9. Care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decision making. 10. When possible, interventions address the underlying source(s) of the problem area(s), not just symptoms or triggers. 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. 12. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: ( .) b. when the desired outcome is not met; c. when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. <BR/>at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS assessment. ( .)

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of eight residents (Resident #32) reviewed for infection control.<BR/>The facility failed to ensure CNA B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #32 on 02/12/2025.<BR/>This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.<BR/>The findings include:<BR/>Record review of Resident #32's Face Sheet, dated 02/12/2025, reflected Resident #32 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #32 had diagnoses which included Wernicke's encephalopathy (neurological condition caused by deficiency of vitamin B1) and muscle weakness. <BR/>Record review of Resident #32's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/13/2024, reflected severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 3. The MDS reflected Resident #32 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent on staff for toileting needs. <BR/>Record review of Resident #32's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 11/13/2024, reflected Resident #32 needs assistance with daily ADL care and one intervention was to assist as needed with incontinent care. <BR/>An observation and interview on 02/12/25 at 10:15 AM revealed CNA B provided incontinence care for Resident #32. CNA B explained to Resident #32 what she was going to do. CNA B collected care items and washed her hands in Resident #32's restroom. CNA B pulled the drape around Resident #32's bed to provide privacy. CNA B put on clean gloves and loosened the tabs on each side of Resident #32's brief. CNA B used a wipe to clean one side of the labia (part of the female genitalia) with one swipe and dropped the wipe in the wastebasket next to her. CNA B changed gloves without performing hand hygiene and used a clean wipe to clean the other side of the labia. CNA B dropped the wipe in the wastebasket and changed gloves without performing hand hygiene. CNA B used a wipe to clean the vagina (part of the female genital tract) and dropped the wipe into the wastebasket. CNA B removed her gloves, used hand sanitizer, and put on clean gloves. Resident #32 rolled to the right side. CNA B used a clean wipe to clean one side of Resident #32's bottom and changed gloves. CNA B cleaned the other side of Resident #32's bottom and changed gloves. CNA B cleaned between the buttocks, wiping away from the vagina, and changed gloves. CNA B wiped again between the buttocks to ensure the resident was clean. She dropped the wipe and soiled brief into the wastebasket. CNA B removed the soiled gloves, used hand sanitizer, and put on clean gloves. She placed a clean brief under the resident and applied barrier cream on her bottom. CNA B removed her gloves and used hand sanitizer before putting on clean gloves. CNA B secured the tabs on each side of Resident #32's brief and pulled up the sheet to cover the resident. CNA B removed her gloves and washed her hands in Resident #32's restroom. When asked about hand hygiene practice, CNA B stated she should have washed her hands or used hand sanitizer each time she took off the dirty gloves. CNA B stated it was important because it helped prevent spreading bacteria on the resident's body and to other residents. <BR/>In an interview on 02/12/2025 at 10:28 AM, LVN A stated it was important to prevent the spread of germs during incontinence care because it could cause a UTI (infection in the kidneys or bladder). LVN A stated staff should always sanitize or wash their hands after removing dirty gloves and before putting on clean gloves. <BR/>In an interview on 02/12/2025 at 10:40 AM, the ADON stated it was important to follow hand hygiene measures and prevent the spread of germs and bacteria to other residents. She stated she would in-service staff. <BR/>In an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:20 PM, the DON stated her expectation was for staff to use hand sanitizer or wash their hands before putting on clean gloves and after removing dirty gloves. The DON stated there could be a tiny hole in the glove that was unnoticed. She stated staff could introduce bacteria while providing incontinence care and spread bacteria to the next resident they provided care for. She stated proper hand hygiene was an important infection control measure. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy Briefs/Underpads, revised January 2024, reflected when providing incontinence care to Remove gloves, sanitize hands and replace with clean gloves.<BR/>

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for quality of care. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure Resident #58 did not have a wound bandage on her right elbow, dated 02/01/25, when observed for wound care on 02/11/2025. <BR/>This failure could place residents at risk of prolonged wound healing and infection. <BR/>The findings include:<BR/>Record review of Resident #58's Face Sheet, dated 02/11/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #58 had diagnoses which included Rheumatoid arthritis (chronic inflammation of joints and other parts of the body) and age-related physical debility. <BR/>Record review of Resident #58's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/12/2024, reflected Resident #58 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14. Section M indicated Resident #58 had skin tears and was treated with the application of non-surgical dressings. <BR/>Record review of Resident #58's Physician Orders did not reflect an order for a wound dressing on the resident's right elbow. <BR/>Record review of Resident #58's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 02/01/2025, reflected resident was at high risk for skin related injury due to chronic conditions, impaired mobility, incontinence, and dependence on staff for ADL's. One intervention was nurse or wound care team will provide wound care per MD's orders.<BR/>Review of Resident #58's wound details, dated 02/13/2025, reflected the right elbow had Partial flap loss: flap cannot be repositioned to cover the wound and the wound measured 2.1 x 0.8 cm. The wound details did not reflect signs of infection. <BR/>Observation and interview on 02/11/25 AT 11:08 AM revealed a dressing on Resident #58's right elbow, dated 02/01/25. The Wound Care Nurse stated he did not recognize the nurse's initials on the dressing. He stated he had just returned to work after taking time off and agency nurses provided wound care during his absence. The Wound Care Nurse removed the dressing on Resident #58's right elbow. An assessment revealed dried blood and a scant amount of serosanguinous (mix of clear serous fluid and blood) drainage on the dressing. The Wound Care Nurse covered the wound with clean gauze, washed his hands in the resident's restroom, and went into the hall to look at the Physician's Orders on his laptop. The Wound Care Nurse stated there was no order for a dressing on the right elbow. He stated the nurse who assessed and provided the wound care should have added an order for a dressing so other nurses would know to change the dressing. The Wound Care Nurse called the resident's doctor, reported the skin tear, and received an order for wound care. The Wound Care Nurse stated there was a standing order for residents who received a skin tear to be changed three times a week, on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. <BR/>During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 10:40 AM, the ADON stated there was a standing order for treatment of skin tears. She stated if an order was not in Resident #58's chart, the nurses might not be aware there was a dressing on the elbow. She stated it could cause infection if the dressing stayed on the wound longer than it should. <BR/>During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:20 PM, the DON stated the facility used agency nurses to provide wound care for a few days while the wound care nurse was out. She stated there were standing orders for a skin tear and any nurse could put an order in the resident's chart. She stated if a wound was not monitored, and the dressing changed as ordered, it could get infected. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy Wound Care: Dressing Change , revised January 2025, reflected provide step-by-step guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing .apply treatments as indicated by provider's order. <BR/>

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of one resident (Resident #92) of six residents reviewed for medications and pharmacy services.<BR/>The facility failed to store Resident #92's medication in a locked compartment. <BR/>This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not having their medications available as prescribed or possible drug diversions.<BR/>Findings included: <BR/>Review of Resident #92's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included:; anemia, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, depression, and metabolic encephalopathy. Her BIMS score was 99 which indicated she was unable to complete the interview. <BR/>Review of Resident #92's medication administration history dated 10/01/22-10/12/22 revealed she was administered the following medications at 9:00 AM; aspirin, Colace, Eliquis, Lasix, multivitamin with minerals, potassium chloride, Pro-Stat AWC, sertraline, and Tylenol.<BR/>Observation on 10/10/22 between 10:30 AM to 10:40 AM revealed Resident #92's morning medications were left in cup on her bedside table. Her nurse LVN Cwas observed passing medications at the end of the hall to other residents. <BR/>Interview with Resident #92 on 10/10/22 at 10:30 AM revealed LVN C left her morning medication on her bedside table. She stated she forgot her medications were on her bedside table. She stated LVN C had left her medications on her bedside table before but did not recall the date. She stated she did not know what medications she was provided. <BR/>Interview with Resident #92 on 10/10/22 at 10:40 AM revealed she took her morning medications. She stated she did not remember if LVN C came back to her room to supervise her medication administration.<BR/>Interview with LVN C on 10/12/22 at 11:58 AM revealed he left Resident #92's morning medications on her bedside table. He stated he did not know what medications she was prescribed and would have to check EMR. He stated Resident #92 preferred to take her medications after breakfast and had to be redirected to take her medications. He stated he usually stand stood in the room and supervised her taking her medications. He stated he left the medications on her bedside table because she was slow at swallowing her medications. LVN C stated her medications were not supposed to be left on her bedside table. He stated Resident #92 was at risk of aspirating on medication or disposing of the medication if not supervised. He stated he went back into the room to administer her medications. <BR/>Interview with ADON B on 10/12/22 at 12:19 PM revealed Resident #92's medications were not supposed to be left on her bedside table. She stated LVN C was supposed to check her name, make sure she could wallow, compare medication to EMAR, and make sure she could tolerate medications. She stated the nurse was supposed to make sure Resident #92 swallowed medications before leaving the room. She stated she was responsible for ensuring staff were trained on storage of medication. She stated the risks to Resident #92 were she could have dropped them, someone else could have come in and taken them, she could have choked on medication, and she might not have taken all of her medications. <BR/>Review of the facility policy titled Controlled Substances Policy and Procedure dated 02/01/17, revealed, The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances.

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distributed, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. <BR/>1. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff wore the appropriate beard and hair covering while food was being prepared in the main kitchen.<BR/>2. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure the food stored in the refrigerator was properly sealed from air-borne contaminants.<BR/>3. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the basement area was cleaned and the ice scoop holder was not exposed to air-borne contaminants.<BR/>4. <BR/>The facility failed to cover a large trash can stored in the kitchen area.<BR/>5. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure the food storage bins in the dry storage area were cleaned. <BR/>6. <BR/>The facility failed to discard expired food in the refrigerator. <BR/>7. <BR/>The facility failed to place a cover on top of the tea dispenser to avoid air borne contaminants.<BR/>These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses.<BR/>Findings include: <BR/>Observations on 02/11/25 from 9:10 AM to 9:17 AM in the facility's main kitchen revealed: <BR/>The ice machine door, located in the basement outside of the kitchen, had white and brown dirt stains inside the door and a white plastic piece located above the ice had black dirt and rust on it. The ice scoop was sitting in a holder, but it was exposed to airborne contaminants because it was not covered. <BR/>One large trash can, which contained food and trash, in the kitchen area, was uncovered. <BR/>One tubing of whip cream, stored in the refrigerator, had a use by date of 02/05/25 and was not discarded.<BR/>Dish water T was observed walking around the kitchen area, and he was observed to have a beard that was at least a &frac14; inch in length, but no beard covering was worn.<BR/>Cook S and [NAME] B were wearing baseball caps but had large ponytails, at least 2 inches in length protruding from the baseball caps. <BR/>Four large storage bins containing rice, flour, sugar, and breadcrumbs, were in dirt-stained containers. The containers had brownish and black stains on the outside and inside of the containers. <BR/>One large box of bacon, located in the freezer, was not sealed, and exposed to airborne contaminants.<BR/>One large tea dispenser, located in the kitchen area, did not have a lid placed on the top dispenser to avoid air-borne contaminants. <BR/>In an interview on 02/12/25 at 12:46 PM, the DM was advised of Dishwasher T being observed with a beard, approximately more than a &frac14; inch in length, and no beard covering was worn. She was also advised [NAME] S and [NAME] B were wearing baseball caps but had large ponytails protruding from the baseball caps. The DM was advised of their entire hair needing to be covered to avoid hair from falling into the resident's food. She stated this was her fault because she was not aware of this. She advised she would be correcting this concern. She was shown pictures of the concerns in the main kitchen, and she stated the cooks and dishwashers were responsible for ensuring the kitchen equipment, be cleaned at least once a week. She stated the ice machine was cleaned by maintenance monthly and she would meet with them to clean it. She stated she would get with the ED to discuss getting a suitable container to hold the ice scoop to avoid it being in the open and exposed to airborne contaminants.<BR/>In an interview on 02/13/25 at 09:30 AM, the Executive Director was advised and shown pictures of the concerns observed in the facility's main kitchen area. She advised she had not met with her Dietary Manager yet to address the concerns. She stated the concerns not being addressed could result in food contamination and residents could get sick. She stated she would follow up with the DM.<BR/>Record review of the facility's policy on Food Receiving and Storage (November 2022), revealed Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .1. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled and dated ('use by' date) .7. Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated and monitored so they are used by their 'use-by' date, frozen, or discarded. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy on Food Safety and Sanitation (2023), revealed, All local, state, and federal standards and regulations will be followed to assure a safe and sanitary food and nutrition services department .c. Employees are required to have their hair styled so that it does not touch the collar, and to wear clean aprons, clothes, and closed toe shoes. <BR/>o <BR/>Hair restraints are required and should cover all hair on the head. <BR/>o <BR/>Beard nets are required when facial hair is visible .<BR/>6. <BR/>Employees will follow proper cleaning and sanitizing instructions for all kitchen equipment.<BR/>Record review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Code (2022) revealed, Packaged Food shall be labeled as specified in LAW, including 21 CFR 101 food Labeling, 9 CFR 317 Labeling, Marking Devices, and Containers, and 9 CFR 381 Subpart N Labeling and Containers, and as specified under &sect; 3-202.18 .Food shall be protected from contamination that may result from a factor or source not specified under Subparts 3-301 - 3-306.<BR/>Record review of Title 21--Food and Drugs Chapter I--Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services<BR/>Subchapter b - Food for Human Consumption part 110 -- current good manufacturing practice in manufacturing, packing, or holding human food.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for quality of care. <BR/>The facility failed to ensure Resident #58 did not have a wound bandage on her right elbow, dated 02/01/25, when observed for wound care on 02/11/2025. <BR/>This failure could place residents at risk of prolonged wound healing and infection. <BR/>The findings include:<BR/>Record review of Resident #58's Face Sheet, dated 02/11/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #58 had diagnoses which included Rheumatoid arthritis (chronic inflammation of joints and other parts of the body) and age-related physical debility. <BR/>Record review of Resident #58's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/12/2024, reflected Resident #58 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14. Section M indicated Resident #58 had skin tears and was treated with the application of non-surgical dressings. <BR/>Record review of Resident #58's Physician Orders did not reflect an order for a wound dressing on the resident's right elbow. <BR/>Record review of Resident #58's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 02/01/2025, reflected resident was at high risk for skin related injury due to chronic conditions, impaired mobility, incontinence, and dependence on staff for ADL's. One intervention was nurse or wound care team will provide wound care per MD's orders.<BR/>Review of Resident #58's wound details, dated 02/13/2025, reflected the right elbow had Partial flap loss: flap cannot be repositioned to cover the wound and the wound measured 2.1 x 0.8 cm. The wound details did not reflect signs of infection. <BR/>Observation and interview on 02/11/25 AT 11:08 AM revealed a dressing on Resident #58's right elbow, dated 02/01/25. The Wound Care Nurse stated he did not recognize the nurse's initials on the dressing. He stated he had just returned to work after taking time off and agency nurses provided wound care during his absence. The Wound Care Nurse removed the dressing on Resident #58's right elbow. An assessment revealed dried blood and a scant amount of serosanguinous (mix of clear serous fluid and blood) drainage on the dressing. The Wound Care Nurse covered the wound with clean gauze, washed his hands in the resident's restroom, and went into the hall to look at the Physician's Orders on his laptop. The Wound Care Nurse stated there was no order for a dressing on the right elbow. He stated the nurse who assessed and provided the wound care should have added an order for a dressing so other nurses would know to change the dressing. The Wound Care Nurse called the resident's doctor, reported the skin tear, and received an order for wound care. The Wound Care Nurse stated there was a standing order for residents who received a skin tear to be changed three times a week, on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. <BR/>During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 10:40 AM, the ADON stated there was a standing order for treatment of skin tears. She stated if an order was not in Resident #58's chart, the nurses might not be aware there was a dressing on the elbow. She stated it could cause infection if the dressing stayed on the wound longer than it should. <BR/>During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:20 PM, the DON stated the facility used agency nurses to provide wound care for a few days while the wound care nurse was out. She stated there were standing orders for a skin tear and any nurse could put an order in the resident's chart. She stated if a wound was not monitored, and the dressing changed as ordered, it could get infected. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy Wound Care: Dressing Change , revised January 2025, reflected provide step-by-step guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing .apply treatments as indicated by provider's order. <BR/>

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure any irregularities noted by the pharmacist during the review were documented on a separate, written report that was sent to the attending physician and the facility's medical director and director of nursing and listed, at minimum, the resident's name, the relevant drug, and the irregularity the pharmacist identified for 2 of 5 residents (Resident # 32 and #64) reviewed for drug regimen review<BR/>The facility failed to ensure Residents #32 and #64's Pharmacist Consultant recommendation for the gradual dose reduction was addressed <BR/>This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medications and dosages.<BR/>Findings include:<BR/>Record review of Resident #32's face sheet reflected she was [AGE] years old. She was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #32's diagnosis included dementia without behavior disturbances, mood disturbances, anxiety, hypertension, major depressive disorder, pain in the right shoulder and insomnia.<BR/>Review of the MDS dated [DATE] as a quarterly assessment reflected Resident #32 hearing, vision and speech was adequate, had a BIMS score of 9 (Mild cognitive impairment), needed supervision with activities of daily living. On active diagnosis depression and non-Alzheimer's dementia was checked. Under medications reflected the Resident #32 was taking antipsychotic, antianxiety and antidepressant. <BR/>Review of the physician order report dated 09/12/22 - 10/12/22 reflected Resident #32 was taking Seroquel 25 mg one tablet twice daily for schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, the medication was started on 03/31/20, Xanax 0.5 mg one tablet once daily for anxiety. <BR/>Review of the Psychotropic and sedative/Hypnotic utilization dated between 7/25/22 - 7/29/22 for Resident #32 reflected the last evaluation for gradual dose reduction for Seroquel 25 mg twice daily and Xanax 0.5 mg was completed on 8/18/21 and the next gradual dose reduction was scheduled for 8/2022 for Seroquel and Xanax.<BR/>Review of the medication regimen review dated 8/30/22 reflected a recommendation for trial dose reduction for Xanax 0.5 mg every day and Seroquel 25 mg twice daily and the recommendation had not been addressed. <BR/>Review of Resident #32's care plan edited 12/08/21 reflected an anti-psychotics assessment and evaluation, the resident was at risk for adverse reactions to psychotropic medications related to side effects. Goals was for Resident #32 not to have signs or symptoms of adverse reaction from psychotropic medications. Approach was to evaluate quarterly and attempt to reduce medication to keep on lowest therapeutic dosage.<BR/>Record review of Resident #64's face sheet reflected she was [AGE] years old female. She was re-admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnosis included, Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, depression, pain, dementia without behaviors, psychotic disturbance, and lack of coordination. <BR/>Review of the MDS dated [DATE] for quarterly assessment reflected Resident #64 was usually understood, she had a BIMS score of 6 (cognitively impaired), no behaviors, needed supervision to minimal assistance with activities of daily living. On the active diagnosis Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder and depression were checked. Under the medication it indicated the resident was on antianxiety, antidepressant and hypnotics. <BR/>Review of the physician order report dated 09/12/22 - 10/12/22 reflected Resident #64 was taking buspirone 10 mg one tablet three times a day, start date was 08/17/21. <BR/>Review of the psychotropic and sedative/hypnotic utilization for Resident #64 dated between 7/25/22 - 7/29/22 reflected buspirone last gradual dose reduction was completed on 2/26/22 and the next gradual dose reduction was due on 8/2022<BR/>Review of the pharmacy consultant for medication regimen review for Resident #64 dated 8/29/22 reflected a recommendation for buspirone 10 mg three times a day to be decreased to twice daily and the recommendation had not been addressed. <BR/>Review of Resident #64 care plan edited 06/05/20 reflected Resident #64 was on antidepressant drug therapy and there was a potential for complications related to antidepressant medication use. Short term goal target date of 08/13/22 indicated the resident use of the medication will result in maintenance or improvement in the resident's functional status. Approach was to monitor for drug use effectiveness and adverse consequences. <BR/>In an interview on 10/11/22 at 03:11 PM with LVN A (ADON) she stated the facility did not have DON who was responsible to printing out the pharmacy report and LVN A was to follow up with the pharmacy recommendations. LVN A stated after the pharmacy completes the recommendations, she emailed the DON, and the recommendations were passed on the ADON's on each floor to follow up with the primary care provider. The pharmacy recommendations were to be completed within one to two weeks. LVN A stated she talked with both resident's primary care and the primary care giver stated she was in the facility yesterday and she was not made aware that she needed to sign the pharmacy recommendations, LVN A stated she did not see the primary care provider when she was in the facility, she could have given her the pharmacy recommendations to address them. LVN A stated going forward she has already put a binder together for the primary care giver so that when she came to the facility, she was able to address the pharmacy recommendations timely. LVN A stated she did not remember when she reached out to the primary care provider to make sure the pharmacy recommendations were addressed, she also stated the did not fax or email the pharmacy reports rather she could make a call to the primary care provider. LVN A stated she did did not have anyone to follow up on her to make sure the pharmacy recommendations were completed timely. LVN A the pharmacy recommendations for psychotropic medications were to be addressed timely to prevent any side effects from the medications. <BR/>Review of the facility policy dated Psychotropic/Antipsychotic medication use revised March 2018 reflected, .Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review.1. Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. Continued use of the medication will be reviewed at least quarterly.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for medication storage.<BR/>The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 didn't have a box of Mucinex (medication used to treat the symptoms of cough and congestion) tablets left unattended and unsecured on the bedside table on 02/11/2025.<BR/>This failure could place residents at risk for misappropriation of property, risk for accidents, hazards, and not receiving therapeutic effects of the medication. <BR/>The findings include:<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Face Sheet, dated 02/11/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included Covid-19 (respiratory illness caused by a virus) and acute respiratory failure (respiratory condition that makes it difficult to breathe).<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Quarterly MDS (tool used to assess health and functional capabilities status of resident) Assessment, dated 01/05/2025, reflected Resident #40 had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 07. Section I did not reflect current treatment for a pulmonary (lung related) condition.<BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Physician Orders, dated 03/13/2022, reflected Mucinex D 60-600 mg tablet extended release 12 hr 600mg, oral, Twice A Day - PRN. <BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 01/05/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for progression/onset of opportunistic infection related to Covid-19 virus positive status (per CDC recommendation) - Resolved. One intervention was to administer medications and treatments as ordered. <BR/>Record review of Resident #40's Continuity of Care, dated 02/14/2025, reflected the last dose of Mucinex D was administered by facility staff on 09/19/2023 at 01:58 PM. <BR/>Observation and interview on 02/11/2025 AT 10:46 AM revealed an open box of Mucinex on Resident #40's bedside table. The box of Mucinex was in a plastic organizer that held the resident's personal items. Resident #40 stated her family member brought the box of Mucinex to her a long time ago, but she had not taken any of the medication. <BR/>During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 10:53 AM, the ADON stated the medication should not have been in Resident #40's room. She stated an assessment and physician's order was required for a resident to self-administer medication and Resident #40 did not have an assessment included in her chart to self-administer medication. The ADON stated the resident could have taken the medication and staff also gave the medication to the resident. The ADON stated we do not want her to overmedicate. The ADON removed the medication from Resident #40's room.<BR/>During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 11:01 AM, LVN C stated she had not seen the Mucinex in Resident #40's room. LVN C stated the Mucinex should not have been in Resident #40's room. She stated the resident might take more than the directions said and staff would not know. LVN C stated residents could only have medication in their room if the doctor authorized it. <BR/>During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:20 PM, the DON stated sometimes family brought things to residents and staff did not know about. The DON stated the administrator contacted Resident #40's family and asked them not to bring medication to the resident's room. The DON stated another resident could go in Resident #40's room and take the medication. The DON stated a resident was required to pass an assessment and have a physician's order to self-administer medication. <BR/>Record review of the facility's policy Self-Administration of Medications , revised February 2021, reflected Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration are turned over to the nurse in charge for return to the family or responsible party.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one of six residents (Resident #4) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to conceal Resident #4's gall bladder bag lying in public view. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their right to a dignified existence and self-determination maintained.Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 10/02/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnosis of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux disease (digestive disease). Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 8/11/25, reflected Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 99 (unable to complete the interview). The Quarterly MDS Assessment reflected an active diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis (inflammation of gall bladder). Record review of Resident #4's Physician Order, dated 10/02/25, reflected RESIDENT HAS ORDER FOR C-TUBE (GALLBLADDER TUBE) PLEASE ENSURE BAG IS COVERED WITH PILLOWCASE FOR PRIVACY/DIGNITY. In an observation and interview on 10/02/25 at 10:18 AM, ADON M and the Surveyor observed Resident #4's gall bladder bag on the bed near her and she did not have a privacy bag. ADON M stated the resident needed a privacy bag because it was a dignity issue. He stated he did not know why she did not have one. In an interview on 10/02/25 at 10:22 AM, LVN O was told by the Surveyor that Resident #4 was observed to have a gall bladder bag sitting on top of the bed, uncovered. She stated the resident needed the bag covered for privacy. She stated she made rounds this morning but did not check to ensure the bag was covered. In an interview on 10/02/25 at 10:39 AM, ADON Y was told by the Surveyor that Resident #4 was observed to have a gall bladder bag sitting on top of the bed, uncovered. She stated she went to the resident's room and confirmed she did have a gall bladder bag exposed. She stated the nursing staff normally used a pillowcase to cover it. She stated it should be covered for infection control, privacy, and for the resident's dignity. In an interview on 10/02/25 at 12:07 PM the DON stated ADON Y told her about Resident #4 not having a privacy bag for her gall bladder bag. She stated the resident should have been provided with a privacy bag or a pillowcase to cover the bag. She stated the bag was needed to protect the resident's dignity. Record review of the facility's policy on Dignity, dated September 2022, revealed Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem.